LSAT Sensei | Journey to Law School

Use Your Paper and Pencil; Not Your Head

2012-02-18T01:25:00.000-08:00

Today, I met a prospective client in California. Super smart guy. I noticed, however, him doing everything in his head. The Analytical Reasoning (a.k.a. Logic Games) question was asking for a min/max list. He clearly knew what the question was asking for and he also knew exactly how to derive at the correct answer. However, he didn't get the correct answer. All because he didn't keep track of which variables he already used (and which ones he had not yet used).

He could have avoided this careless and silly mistake by simply remembering to write out his work.

There's nothing wrong with writing things out. It doesn't mean you're any less smarter than the person who can do it all in his head. The LSAT isn't measuring how fast you can deduce and calculate something in your head per se. It's a multiple choice test that measures your accuracy + speed. Avoid silly mistakes. Take the 2 nano-seconds to write out your work.

Waitlist - Good News or Bad News?

2012-02-16T12:18:00.000-08:00

Here's an email exchange between a client and me:

Client: Hey David! Hope you're having a great Thursday. Just got a waitlist e-mail from Berkeley. To be honest, I think most schools are pretty done with offers and I am destined for waitlists at the rest of the schools I applied to. Ughhhh. Quite frustrating.

Me: Waitlists are good. Obviously, Acceptance letters are better. But I think people grossly underestimate what being Waitlisted means.

First and foremost, most people who get waitlisted do nothing. They just sit there. Bad move. Every year, no matter how well and meticulous a law school goes about shaping their incoming class, there are always extra seats left. There are always people bumped in from the waitlist.

Once you receive a complete list of waitlist schools, you need to sit and decide which school is your number one choice. Once you've made that decision, we can start playing the game - and making sure you standout among other waitlisted applicants (the list of waitlisted applicants is actually small).

We'll talk more about this strategy once you've heard back from all the schools you care to hear back from.

But keep your chin-up~ I know TONS of people who'd kill to be in your position.

The

Lemons or Lemonade

2012-02-16T12:06:00.000-08:00

It's easy to get into a dismal state of depression around this time of year.

Valentine's Day was Blue (not Pink)

Valentine's Day was a few days ago - and he/she forgot. Or even worse, there was no one special to celebrate it with.If you are in the former category, then see here for a little inspiration on how you can teach your "beloved" a lesson.

Alas, if you are in the latter category, get your chin-up. Logically speaking, Valentine's Day is no different from any other day (see here). Don't let capitalistic consumerism weigh you down. We all know Valentine's Day is just another day for those (inconsiderate) candy shops and flower companies to get RICH off of you!

Post-LSAT Blues

But perhaps the most tragic story of all, is that the LSAT was a few days ago, and you feel like you bombed it. I tell my pupils, "Don't to fret." When life throws lemons - go make some lemonade. The LSAT is not a "one-shot ends all" test. It can be taken more than once. And yes, contrary to popular urban myth, you can still get into a top-notch law school after taking the LSAT more than once.

Blue from Running the LSAT Marathon

I know of several students who have been studying for the LSAT for nearly a year. They typically come find me after trying (and failing with) countless behemoth test prep companies. It's easy to become discouraged.

Take a step back and reignite the first-love and fire for law school. When you feel like you've done one too many LSAT games, and one too many logical reasoning questions, that means you're burned-out. You've lost the will power to keep going. Everything seems futile and meaningless.

Stop all LSAT studying and endeavors. When you're blue from running the LSAT marathon, you've got to go on vacation. Rejuvenate and reclaim.

February LSAT - Tomorrow!?

2012-02-10T06:04:00.000-08:00

For those of you taking the February LSAT (tomorrow) - ROCK IT and DESTROY IT!!!

DON'T FORGET:

Your ticket (w/picture)
Pencils (plenty of 'em)
Eraser(s)
Water + Snack(s)
Plastic Bag (airport friendly size will do) for carrying most of the above
To eat BREAKFAST

Sleep early. Remember all that you learned and practiced. Going in there with a good attitude is important; having a good attitude goes a long way (seehere)! Also Relax and think, "Even if I "bomb" one question/game/passage, who cares? I'll get everything else correct!"

I'll be sending good vibes to y'all!

Day Before Victory Day

2012-02-10T06:02:00.000-08:00

It's that time - the day before the LSAT. The big question on everyone's mind: "How do I best spend this day?" Here are a list of 7 to dos before test day and 5 last minute tips.

The most important advice is to relax. And don't attempt to take a full-practice exam. In fact, don't study at all today.

I'm doing laundry right now. I've been cleaning and brushing my place since 6:00AM. I'm going to get a lot of calls today. It's part of my job to stay calm, so that my students can stay calm.

Lawyer Joke

2012-02-08T14:00:00.000-08:00

Here's a good lawyer joke - enjoy:

“Psst”
“What?”
“We don’t have a chance in hell of winning!”
“Is there something you need to tell me? You said you weren’t there.”
“No, I wasn’t there that night, I didn’t kill anyone.”
“Then what makes you think were going to lose?”
“The DA, she’s pretty hot”
“I know.”
“Did you see what she keeps doing?”
“What?”
“She keeps leaning over the bench when she talks to the witness.”
“Big deal, what’s that has to do with anything?”
“She’s wearing that short little skirt and not wearing any panties!”
“Yes, I know, she always does that.”
“Yes? You knew that and you picked mostly men for the jury?”
“Look, I know what I’m doing.”
“Look at juror number five, he’s drooling”
“Me too, she’s hot.”
“I’m going to get fried! We should tell the Judge.”
“I don’t think that will work, he’s an old hound dog who has been married four times.”
“Great, I’m going to get life for something I didn’t do because the DA is a slut, the jury is mostly men, and the Judge is a whore hound!”
“I’m a great lawyer, have faith.”
“The deck is stacked against me, I’m done”
“You see juror’s number one, two, three, six, eight, and nine?”
“Yes, four guys, and one girl, what about them?”
“They’re gay, see I know what I’m doing.”
“You’re the best lawyer ever!”
“Thanks. Now just enjoy the show and smile at the jury.”

Flaw: Boogeyman Flaw

2012-02-07T21:41:00.000-08:00

"Can you prove that there is no Boogeyman? You can't. Thus, he exists!"

Just because you can't prove it (i.e., the Boogeyman), doesn't mean the opposite is true. This, my friends, is what I endearingly call, the Boogeyman flaw.

Actual LSAT examples can be found:

PT 35 (Oct 01), LR 2, #7
PT 40 (Jun 03), LR 1, #14
PT 43 (Jun 04), LR 1, #12
PT 42 (Dec 03), LR 1, #26
PT 45 (Dec 04), LR 2, #24
PT 47 (Oct 05), LR 1, #8
PT 55 (Oct 08), LR 1, #20

Flaw: Survey Error

2012-02-04T09:33:00.000-08:00

"It's clearly evident that pop culture's obsession with health and organic food is unfounded. A recent study surveyed first-year medical students about the sorts of health and dietary regiments they follow. After all, who has more interest in human health and diet than those aspiring to become doctors? Surprisingly, however, an overwhelming majority said that they don't exercise regularly or follow particular diets."

Survey errors are one of the one of the most common flaws tested on the LSAT. Here are simple ways to identify them:

1) First and foremost, vignettes that contain survey errors will always have some sort of survey, poll, or statistic - basically anything involving data compilation. Take the above vignette for example - "A recent study surveyed...".

2) The sample size will NOT be accurate and/or representative of the larger population. Again, take the above vignette for example - "...medical students...". In this instance, any survey involving only medical students can't be an accurate representation of the entire "pop culture's obsession".

Law Schools in Trouble

2012-02-02T22:11:00.000-08:00

Schools aren't always on your side. At the end of the day they're businesses. Making profit is their underlying motive. 51 disgruntled law school graduates are now finally realizing this.

Pissed, jobless, and upset, these students sued their law schools this past Wednesday. If you ask me, every party is partially at fault. Law schools were wrong to concoct false data. Students were foolish to blindly eat up whatever schools advertised (i.e., "our graduates make $160,000" or "99% of our graduates are employed within 9-months of graduation") - I pity the fool!

As critical as I am of the students, at the end of the day, I say that the conniving schools deserve what's coming to them. Law schools have a fiduciary duty to students. If recent grads taking the bar are required to pass an ethics exams, law schools should also be required to adhere to some strict ethics rules. The America Bar Association (ABA) needs to be a bit harsher.

LSAT 2-Week Pulse Check

2012-01-23T11:31:00.000-08:00

Folks, the LSAT is two-weeks away - it's not this Saturday, it's not next Saturday, but it is the Saturday after next!

At this point, many folks start having a breakdown moment. So if you're hyperventilating or finding yourself taking your frustration/anger out at your friends and/or family, I hope you can feel a bit better knowing that you're not alone.

There are two common reactions among LSAT students, when these breakdown moments hit: 1) Study more and more and more; or 2) avoid and resist the LSAT. Both are at extreme ends of the stress-out spectrum. The former will result in burn-out, and the latter will result in you becoming cold and unprepared. Here are tips on how to avoid both extremes and stay in the healthy middle.

You know you're burning out when:

You feel guilty for not studying enough (this only applies to those who have been studying regularly for weeks, if not months; don't confuse this with being lazy)
You are getting wrong the questions that you normally get correct (again, don't confuse this with being lazy. If you haven't been studying at all, then of course you're getting questions wrong)
You have frequent headaches, you feel dazed, and you are easily agitated (don't confuse this with being sick. If you're sick, go see a doctor).

When you're feeling burnt out you ought to:

Follow a balanced schedule (i.e., with frequent breaks, regular study times, and fun activities planned out)
Find folks who walked the road ahead of you, and get some perspective (i.e., lawyers, Ph.D students, judges - anyone who had to take a "life altering" exam).
Remember to work-out, watch a good movie, or do whatever it is that keeps you happy

If you are going cold and avoiding the LSAT, then honestly, you're not ready for the exam. You might be better off swallowing the cost and withdrawing from the Feb 11th exam.

LSAT Self-Study Schedule

2012-01-06T08:13:00.000-08:00

My blog has a new feature - LSAT Self-Study Schedule! (scroll down and see to your right!). If you follow my schedule, you'll have gone through 20+ practice exams before test date.

Practice makes perfect~ The LSAT is no exception. Talk to anyone who did well on the LSAT and she will tell you that she took practice test after practice test after practice test.

Before every exam, I have my students go through at least 20 rounds of full-length practice exams. But (IMPORTANT WARNING) merely going through the motions and blowing through exams is not productive. You must review your exams and go over not only your mistakes, but also the questions you got correct yet struggled with.

Be vigilant. Remember to have fun. Rest sufficiently.

Picking Law Schools: Prestige vs Money | Part 2

2012-01-04T14:20:00.000-08:00

I wrote a piece last year about law schools that offer both prestige and money to it's incoming students. This past admission cycle (for the incoming class of 2012), for example, Northwestern University School of Law offered (virtually) a full-ride to all those admitted via Early Decision (see here).

But not everyone is so lucky. What to do if you can't have both?

Always take the MONEY. Especially in this economy.

Yes, it's nice to have that prestigious law degree hanging on your wall. But at the end of the day such superficial and short-lived hypes aren't really worth it. A good lawyer many people will find; but a happy lawyer is rare.

Life is short. Why not do everything you can to ensure optimal happiness? If you can get paid to go to law school so that you come out on the other end with a lighter debt burden, then you'll be that much happier.

Law School Applications

2011-12-23T23:47:00.000-08:00

It's that time of year. I'm sitting on 80+ applications for 30+ clients. Some clients are applying to insane numbers of schools. Others have me worried because they aren't casting their nets wide enough.

I am working with 8 JD/MBA clients. The MBA application process is a lot more grueling and tedious because it requires multiple essays and different selling points for different schools.

Fee waivers are immensely useful. Most schools will give it to you; just simply ask them (nicely).

For those of you waiting on your LSAT score, try to relax and enjoy the Holiday weekend(s) (as much as possible).

I'll be back in a few days with some more useful tips. Just giving y'all a holler~!

Elite law firm 2011 bonus - $37,500

2011-12-13T07:48:00.000-08:00

Elite law firms pay hefty bonuses to their associates. Here is what Cravath (an elite of the elite law firms in NYC) paid out to its associates on December 9th, 2011:

Class of 2010 - $7,500
Class of 2009 - $10,000
Class of 2008 - $15,000
Class of 2007 - $20,000
Class of 2006 - $25,000
Class of 2005 - $30,000
Class of 2004 - $37,500

Some associates complain that their bonus. They think they deserve more. It astounds me that they think this. First and foremost, in this economy people shouldn't be complaining (I don't care if you're working 90 hour weeks - you should just be thankful that you have a job! A job that pays a 6-digit salary!).

I've noticed that a major reason behind their complaint is their constant (and incessant) comparing with their clients and buddies, who are either I-bankers or hedge-fund managers. Folks, grass is greener on the other side. Be content and happy with what you have.

2011 Christmas Wishlist for soon-to-be Law Students

2011-12-12T12:36:00.000-08:00

It's that time of year again. For those of you, who are soon-to-be law students (or those who have a loved one starting law school soon), here's an exclusive 2011 Christmas Wishlist just for you.

Trust me, these are all useful, neat, and must-have goods for budding lawyers (like you).

Techie Gadget(s)
ThinkPad X220 - $951.15 Originally priced at over $1400, this workhorse is an awesome gift for any law student. It's a dependable and durable machine. The perfect combination light weight and full power. (use the coupon code TPHOLIDAY here).

MacBook Pro - $1199 Once you go Mac, you don't go back! (or so they say). I'm a PC guy. But we all know the amazing virtues of the MacBook. Virus proof; powerful; and law school compatible.

Great Book(s)
Getting to Maybe: How to Excel on Law School Exams - $23.97 the secret behind the 1L success of yours truly. This is an excellent book that details how a good law school exam should be written. Law school is unlike any academic experience you've ever (or will ever) encounter. I don't care if you have a Ph.D in legal studies; law school exams are an entirely different beast. If you thought the LSAT was difficult, boy are you in for a surprise. This book will definitely help.

Other must have law school prep books. But if you had to choose one, get the one above.

Shape up(s)
Insanity® - $144.80 staying in tip-top physical shape (or as tip-top as you can get) will help maximize your mental performance. If you're going to end up in a law school where the winters are pretty obnoxious (i.e., Boston or Chicago), this is a great investment. You can get your daily workout without having to leave your books far behind. Extra time saved is extra time earned (for your studies).

US Law Firms Flocking to Korea

2011-12-08T08:14:00.000-08:00

It's true. Prestigious (as well as wanna-be prestigious) law firms are all flocking to South Korea right now. It's a great time to be a Korean-English speaking attorney because your job prospects are blossoming overseas - at least for the next few years.

The Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the US and South Korea finally passed. It's been in the talks since I was a 1L. It's about time. What does this mean for US lawyers? Well it means more business and law practice opportunities in Asia!

For those of you who keep asking me whether there is a "GOOD" major for law school, I want to add Asian languages to the lot.

Up until recently, US firms weren't allowed to set-up shop in Korea. Korean based law firms, like Kim & Chang and Bae, Kim & Lee (BKL), essentially had a monopoly. But now that the FTA passed through, you'll be seeing a lot of elite US firms (i.e., Cleary Gottlieb; Simpson Thacher etc.) competing with the Korean based firms.

For those of you who are already 1Ls, contact BKL (here) or Kim & Chang (here), for prestigious/awesome summer associate opportunities in Korea. You'll need to send your resume, cover letter, proof of attendance and transcript.

Dealing with post exam trauma

2011-12-05T06:49:00.000-08:00

Two-days after the LSAT - this is approximately when most students start feeling a bit panicked. "What if I got more wrong than I think?" Yours truly aced the LSAT multiple times, and even he gets these panic attacks (every time he takes the LSAT). It simply can't be helped. We're human and we will naturally waver between extreme optimism and gut wrenching pessimism.

Give it a few more days and you'll reach a Zen-like state of peace. You'll calm down. Then one day, you'll start panicking again when you start reminding yourself about the LSAT again.

Look - if you took the December exam, then you're thinking about sprinting the application process (or you're thinking about giving it one last haul by taking the February exam). So instead of falling prey and becoming enslaved to emotional tug-a-war, practice being a lawyer and let your logical/rational side prevail. Prioritize and organize. Think about what needs to be done, and then execute.

What has been done is done. Think about what can be changed or improved. Change and improve those areas. But what can't be changed or improved, just let go. Compensate by blowing everyone's expectation out of the water with what can be changed/improved. Capish?

Dec LSAT - Good Luck!!!

2011-12-02T19:00:00.000-08:00

For those of you taking the December LSAT (tomorrow) - ROCK IT and DESTROY IT!!!

DON'T FORGET:

Your ticket (w/picture)
Pencils (plenty of 'em)
Eraser(s)
Water + Snack(s)
Plastic Bag (airport friendly size will do) for carrying most of the above
To eat BREAKFAST

Sleep early. Remember all that you learned and practiced. Going in there with a good attitude is important; having a good attitude goes a long way (see here)! Also Relax and think, "Even if I "bomb" one question/game/passage, who cares? I'll get everything else correct!"

I'll be sending good vibes to y'all!

Why our school?

2011-11-23T12:24:00.000-08:00

Some law schools, like some people, have small egos - they want to know why you want to choose them over others.

One of my students finished submitting his applications way back in September. After writing a magnificent personal statement, a winning diversity statement, and compelling addendum, he thought he was done. But alas, this past week he got an email from one of the schools - requesting of him to write a "Why our school?" essay. He asked me for some guidance, here's what I gave him:

Successful ‘why our law school essays’ should address with one or more of the following three topic areas:

1. Professor/Academic Attraction

a. Professor: A professor that you are intent on studying with

i. A good place to start is the faculty bio section on the school website. Each professor has a passion and academic interest. Find a professor you jive with. Do a little more google research on that professor. For example, find the professor’s blog or research paper on SSRN (http://www.ssrn.com/).

b. Academic: A program that you are attracted to

i. A Journal you want to write for (warning: don’t simply name a journal that you find on their website. If you’re going to mention a journal, it’s a good idea to go deeper – for example, find an article that especially intrigued you).

ii. Clinical Program that you’re passionate about (warning: again, don’t simply name a journal that you find on their website. Clinical programs work with the local community – so they often appear in the media. Find any media outlet about the journal that you can quote).

2. Geographic Affinity

a. West/East/South/Midwest attraction – you can always point out that you like the region; you hope to practice law in that region. If you’re not from the region, make a case for why you want to be in that region (e.g., change of scenary; desire to be at the epicenter of corporate law practice; IP law; entertainment law; appellate practice; etc.)

b. Find out something that personally connects you to the town/city, in which the school is located in.

3. Your Personal Quirk

a. Sports team: You like the sports team.

b. Friend/Family: A buddy or family member attended the school.

c. Love at first sight: you fell in love with the school at first sight.

LSAT Alumni - Lawyering: What they don't teach law students

2011-11-21T04:33:00.000-08:00

This past weekend, the NY Times article by David Segal has created quite the buzz among legal academics, lawyers and law students.

Are law schools really failing to teach their students good lawyering skills? Or is David Segal being overly critical?

Here's my two cents. It's easy to misinterpret what goes on inside law school classrooms. Arcane cases and abstract legal theories may seem irrelevant to "actual" lawyering. After all, law school is a professional school. What good are outdated cases if it ain't useful for today's practice?

Most folks who think this are missing the point. What sets apart a great lawyer from a mediocre lawyer is thinking; both creative and efficient thinking. Anyone can learn to search out and draft a form contract - paralegals and secretaries learn to do it all the time. It doesn't take much intellectual fire-power to repeat, recycle and reuse what's already been drafted. Real intellectual fire-power comes to play when, for example, writing a legal brief for the US Supreme Court or engineering a multi-billion dollar merger between two corporate giants.

Law schools prepare students to think very creatively, quickly and efficiently. You learn to ask the questions most people don't. You learn to analyze in methods you never thought to implement. The more complex and deeper level of thinking achieved through examination and discourse of 'classical' cases can be paralleled to high school or college students reading Plato, the Bible or Shakespeare to gain a complex and deeper level of understanding of humanity. The difference is that law school teaches you to laser in and think methodically through all sides of all issues - no stone is left unturned.

So do I agree with David Segal? Not really. I do agree that law schools can better prepare students, so that they can graduate from school and hang a shingle. But should legal education be reduced to learning merely how to recycle and reuse form contracts? No. That's like saying in medical school, med students should focus on learning to do what nurses do (e.g., giving shots, etc.) because it's more practical than memorizing various chemicals and body parts.

Which major is "better" for the LSAT / law school?

2011-11-11T14:04:00.000-08:00

If you've attended a law school discussion panel, wherein admissions deans (often from prestigious law schools) hold Q&A sessions, you've inevitably heard a student asking the following question: "So which major is best for LSAT (or law school) preparation?"

The canned responses are always: "You can't prepare for law school"; "There is no ideal major."; "Study what you want to study."

But unfortunately, the admissions deans aren't being completely honest (either that or they are misinterpreting the question). When a student asks "which major is best" they aren't asking for an opinion; they are asking for hard facts - do some majors fair better (on average) on the LSAT than others? The answer is - Yes!

According to this study, certain majors do better on the LSAT. Economics majors, Mathematics majors, and/or Philosophy majors, for example, do better than Political Science majors, History majors, and/or English majors. Surprised?

If you were a law student (already), you wouldn't be surprised. Most math majors and/or Philosophy majors tend to do better on law school exams. It's the type of organized thinking and methodical writing that they already know how to do (so well). Personally, I didn't know that Econ majors had an advantage. Perhaps I didn't notice because UChicago is already heavily saturated with Econ majors/thinkers?

The LSAT (plus GPA) is a good indicator of 1L success. So it only makes sense that majors that are "better" suited for law school success (on average) are also the same majors that are "better" suited for LSAT success (on average).

So should you go change your major? No! This is just an average taken from across the board (a HUGE board). There are plenty of non-Math, non-Econ, and non-Philosophy majors that do supremely well on the LSAT and in law school. Don't determine your major based on a study on an average. Think about it - on average particular racial groups and age groups do better on the LSAT (and in law school), but does that mean ALL folks of these groups will do well on the LSAT (and in law school). No! Just because you're a Math, Econ, and/or Philosophy major doesn't guarantee that you'll do well on the LSAT (and in law school).

Law firms still hiring?

2011-11-04T05:55:00.000-07:00

On-campus interview (OCI) season may be over, but no need to fret. Jobs are still out there. Most law students get hired after fall OCI. In fact, according to an article by Elizabeth Ewing (from the National Jurist), only 16.9% of the class of 2010 got jobs through fall OCI.

Are law firms still hiring?
Absolutely. Don't just look at big law firms; they wrapped up shop in October. During a downturn, a greater percentage of law grads find jobs at smaller- to mid-sized firms. NALP data shows that 48% of law students who enter private practice will get a job with a firm that has 25 attorneys or less. Moreover, a recent NALP report shows that while big law firm hiring has been cut back, the smaller firms keep hiring at the same pace.

When do small- and mid-sized law firms hire?
They hire after the fall semester. Most hire closer in time to when they want students to start working. This usually means Spring time.

How do you find out who is hiring?
Keep connected to your school's job posting. Go to job fairs. Network with attorneys you know.

Is networking worthwhile?
Definitely. More law students get jobs through referrals or self-initiated contact than through any other means. While job postings and OCI are low-hanging fruit in a job search, cold calling and networking takes time but is worth the investment.

What do small and mid-sized firms want in job candidates?
In one swoop: personality and fit with the firm culture - more so than grades and pedigree. This may surprise some of you hard working and/or elite law students. But welcome to the actual world of legal business - where grades and school are not (as) important. Smaller firms value the person more than the pedigree. This makes perfect sense, since you spend more face time with each other than at a large law firm. Also small- to mid-size firms target a special set of skills - they seek students who understand the business side of a practice and the service nature of the practice. This is probably because at a smaller firm you are expected to bring in business sooner than you would at a large law firm.

How to Marry a Rich Guy | Response from CEO of JP Morgan

2011-11-02T15:58:00.000-07:00

I chuckled after reading this. I don't know if it's true. But you'll get a good kick out of it. I'll let the story speak for itself:

‎"A Reply From CEO of J.P. Morgan To A Pretty Girl Seeking A Rich Husband".. !

A young 'n pretty lady posted this on a popular forum:

... ----------------------------------------------------
Title: What Should I do to Marry A Rich Guy?
----------------------------------------------------

I'm going to be honest of what I'm going to say here. I'm 25 this year. I'm very pretty, have style 'n good taste. I wish to marry a guy with $500k annual salary or above.

You might say that I'm greedy, but an annual salary of $1M is considered only as middle class in New York.

My requirement is not high. Is there anyone in this forum who has an income of $500k annual salary? Are you all married?

I wanted to ask: what should I do to marry rich persons like you?

Among those I've dated, the richest is $250k annual income,'n it seems that this is my upper limit.

If someone is going to move into high cost residential area on the west of New York City Garden(?), $250k annual income is not enough.

I'm here humbly to ask a few questions:
1) Where do most rich bachelors hang out? (Please list down the names 'n addresses of bars, restaurant, gym)
2) Which age group should I target?
3) Why most wives of the riches are only average-looking? I've met a few girls who don't have looks 'n are not interesting, but they are able to marry rich guys.
4) How do you decide who can be your wife, 'n who can only be your girlfriend? (my target now is to get married)

Ms. Pretty

--------
A Philosophical reply from CEO of J.P. Morgan:

Dear Ms. Pretty,
I have read your post with great interest. Guess there are lots of girls out there who have similar questions like yours. Please allow me to analyse your situation as a professional investor.

My annual income is more than $500k, which meets your requirement, so I hope
everyone believes that I'm not wasting time here.

From the standpoint of a business person, it is a bad decision to marry you. The answer is very simple, so let me explain.

Put the details aside, what you're trying to do is an exchange of "beauty" 'n "money" : Person A provides beauty,'n Person B pays for it, fair 'n square.

However, there's a deadly problem here, your beauty will fade, but my money will not be gone without any good reason. The fact is, my income might increase from year to year, but you can't be prettier year after year.

Hence from the viewpoint of economics, I am an appreciation asset, 'n you are a depreciation asset. It's not just normal depreciation, but exponential depreciation. If that is your only asset, your value will be much worse 10 years later.

By the terms we use in Wall Street, every trading has a position, dating with you is also a "trading position".
If the trade value dropped we will sell it 'n it is not a good idea to keep it for long term - same goes with the marriage that you wanted. It might be cruel to say this, but in order to make a wiser decision any assets with great depreciation value will be sold or "leased".

Anyone with over $500k annual income is not a fool; we would only date you, but will not marry you. I would advice that you forget looking for any clues to marry a rich guy. 'n by the way, you could make yourself to become a rich person with $500k annual income.This has better chance than finding a rich fool.

Hope this reply helps. If you are interested in "leasing" services, do contact me.

signed,
J.P. Morgan CEO...

Law Firm Stocks on Sale?

2011-10-30T22:18:00.000-07:00

In the US, only lawyers are permitted to own and operate law firms. The alleged reason and purpose behind this rule is to keep the profession "clean". But the status quo may change real soon. Folks other than lawyers may be able to buy shares and pieces of law firms. (See here).

In England and Australia, they've already started permitting non-lawyers to own parts of legal practices. It will be interesting to see what sort of effects this will have.

Theoretically speaking, when any industry is exposed to the 'free-market' system, it should become more cost efficient for consumers. In other words, good legal service should be more readily available at a much cheaper price. Who knows - perhaps one day, we'll be able to acquire legal service at Wal-Mart. (Again, see here).

International Law and Diplomacy | Kpop 101

2011-10-30T21:53:00.000-07:00

My students know that I'm a Kpop buff. You can make fun of me all you want. But if you want to understand modern Asian culture, you can't avoid the Korean Wave (a.k.a. Hallyu).

For those even remotely interested in practicing law and/or diplomacy in Asia, allow me the pleasure of introducing you to three insanely popular music groups - Big Ban, Girls Generation, and 2PM.

Big Bang - "Tonight"

Girls Generation - "The Boys"

2PM - "Hands Up"

There are roaring fans all over Asia - China, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, etc. Kpop is a multi-billion dollar industry. Seriously, if you ever want to spend time or do business in Asia, definitely take the time to become familiar with Kpop.

LSAT Timer

2011-10-28T12:58:00.000-07:00

PERK: For those who read my blog - you get a 15% discount (compliments from the folks at LSAT Timer) for purchasing any product from the LSAT Timer website. Just go to http://www.lsattimer.com/watch and use the coupon code: 'LSATsensei'

I recently had the privilege of communicating with the creators of LSAT Timer.

Great folks, who absolutely care about bringing to market the most cost-effective product for addressing a pain among LSAT test takers: keeping time.

The LSAT is not just a logic test. It's a reading test as well as a focus test. If you can't read fast enough or focus long enough, then no matter how fluent you are in logic, you won't score well on the exam. It behooves you to train yourself and spend adequate amount of time doing practice exams under actual timed conditions.

35-minutes per section. So quirky. Why not 30-minutes? Anyhow, keeping time can be a huge pain in the neck. So a wrist-watch like the one above is tremendously helpful for keeping time. REMEMBER, you're not permitted to take any sort of digital watch or timer into the LSAT.

After a 15% discount, this watch is a great deal! If you buy two watches (one for you and one for your friend), you're only paying $17.47 a pop. It's worth it, if you think about how much stress you alleviate. You don't have to worry about wasting brain energy on deciphering an analog watch - trying to figure out the exact amount of time gone by.

What does "Sensei" mean?

2011-10-28T12:07:00.000-07:00

Sensei (先生）- literally means "the one who has gone before." A Sensei is an individual who has already walked the path that you are traveling along, and thus has knowledge and life experience to guide you on your way. But a Sensei has to have much more than simply knowledge and technique. There needs to be a huge element of respect and humility involved.

I didn't come up with the name 'LSAT Sensei' - one of students did. One day, during an LSAT class (I was teaching Logic Games), one of the students, duly impressed by what he saw on the board, cocked a smile and said, "You're the LSAT Sensei. I'm gonna call you that from now on."

Thereafter, the name kind of stuck with me.

LSAT Experimental....Section 4?

2011-10-28T11:03:00.000-07:00

"Was section 4 experimental?!"

Several students have been asking me this question. Look, the experimental section can be ANY one of the five sections. Historically speaking, the experimental is usually sections 1, 2 or 3. However, yes, for the first time, to my knowledge, section 4 was included into this lot. Another blog mentions it here.

(For those who heard my "Cheat on the LSAT" lecture - this news totally ruins it).

First and foremost, the experimental section is not the same for everyone. On the same test day, some people get Analytical Reasoning (a.k.a. Logic Games), some people get Logical Reasoning, and some people get Reading Comprehension. Also, on the same test day, the experimental section can be all over the place. Just because your experimental section was section 2 (not that you would know 100%) doesn't mean everyone else's experimental section was also section 2.

The best thing you can do for yourself is prepare to rock all five-sections and perform as though each and every section counts. Don't try to game the system. Instead use that time and energy to better prepare yourself.

Law School | Losing Its Glitter for Pre-Law Students

2011-10-27T07:21:00.000-07:00

2003 - I remember it like yesterday. One year into my LSAT experience, and I was witnessing droves of college students flocking to apply to law school. I was still in college back then. This was before the 'great' economic crash. It seemed as though law school would *always* be in high demand.

But this year, I learn that 'what goes up, must come down' and 'law school will NOT always be in high demand.' Go figure.

Here is the latest article regarding law school applications being down.

What does this mean for current applicants?
Don't panic. First off, it doesn't mean you're crazy. However, you ought to still carefully re-think and re-consider law school. Is it really what you want? How will you pay for law school? Can you be 'okay' not having a job after three-years of hard work? Is law school really the best option for you?

If after doing some careful soul-searching, you really feel/believe/think that law school is still the path for you. Then consider the above article by the National Law Journal a hidden blessing - competition is down. This means that your chances at a higher ranked law school has (to some extent) has gone up.

If law school is still my goal, then what should else should I think about?
As the article mentions, students heavily consider affordability - "Can I pay for this school with the least amount of loans?"

But two other important things to consider are: location and prestige.

Location matters, not only because you want to spend the next three-years of your grueling academic life (or no life) in an environment you'd be happy in, but also because it translates to connections and networks. If you wish to practice law in Chicago, then going to a third-tier law school in Chicago makes more sense than going to a second-tier law school in New York. This paradigm makes sense even at the first-tier law schools, and arguably (albeit only slightly) even at the top-14 level (perhaps only Harvard and Yale are immune to it).

If you don't want to be caught dead in California or Miami, then don't apply to law schools out there. Not in this market.

Prestige also matters. Mainly because it opens doors. But it also - in my experience - translates to a better academic experience (= smarter classmates and awesome teachers). After all, law *SCHOOL* at the end of the day is a school. If you're paying money for it, then you might as well get the best schooling that money can buy.

Most lawyers (like 95% and above) have a very restricted and limited sense of how their law school experience compares to others who attended different law schools. So you will catch many lawyers say, "Law school is law school. You get the same education, no matter where you go." Usually, people who say this, say it grudgingly. Fortunately, they are wrong.

Yes, most (if not all) law schools require 1Ls to take Tort, Civ Pro, Contracts, Crim Law, Property, Legal Writing, and Con Law. But this doesn't mean everyone offers the same education. Just as taking math at Podunk College will drastically differ from taking math at M.I.T., studying Civ Pro at Princeton Law School will drastically differ from taking Civ Pro at UChicago Law.

I had the privilege of sitting in on several Property classes at several different law schools. The gamut of law schools I visited range from the "tip-top of tier-one" to the "very bottom of tier-one". I also had the privilege of attending law school with several classmates who transferred to/from UChicago Law. As result of comparing my notes with my classmates' notes, I conclude that the quality of law school education can be as different as night and day. Generally, speaking, the more prestigious a law school, the much better the quality of education.

Finally, the name of the school will continue to open doors. Even years, after you leave law school.

Low LSAT Score? Remedies and Cures

2011-10-25T23:53:00.000-07:00

If your LSAT score is lower than expected, don't spend *too* much time grieving. Pick yourself. What's been done is done. It's time you come up with a battle plan - a strategy.

Here are 5 remedies to a poor LSAT score.

1) Retake the LSAT. This doesn't sound like an attractive option. I know. Why go back and relive such an excruciating experience? But like it or not, the LSAT is a significant deciding factor for law school admissions. If the school you want to get into has a median LSAT score that is 20 points higher than what you scored, then you really don't have a shot unless you retake and do better.

Some students think it's a good idea to just settle for a lower tier school and then transfer out to a top-tier program after their 1L year. Uh-uh. This is actually a whole lot harder than retaking the LSAT. If you think studying for the LSAT was hard, you're in for a surprise (e.g., law school exams, bar exam, etc.).

2) Write an Addendum. Write a short explanation as to why the law school you are applying to ought to "overlook" your low LSAT score. Though anyone is free to write an addendum - it's not necessarily the wisest move for everyone. The addendum is a good idea, for example, if you are "simply a bad standardized test taker" (as corroborated and demonstrated by your past - i.e., show SAT/ACT score). Despite your low LSAT score(s) you know you'll do well in law school because in the past, despite performing poorly on your college entrance exam, you did amazingly well in college (i.e., 3.7 or above). This sort of addendum can work - especially at schools that are traditionally GPA friendly (e.g., UC Berkeley and UCLA).

The addendum, however, is usually a bad idea, for example, if you have a low GPA and a low LSAT score. Students in this category tend to want to write a couple addenda - one for their low GPA and another for their low LSAT score. This is not a good move. You're essentially asking the law school to "overlook" two important hard-factors. If they can't assess your GPA and LSAT score, what do they use to judge you? Your personal statement? That's not enough.

3) Sparkle Yourself. Take sometime off and do something amazing with your life. Have you always wanted to travel around the world? Do it! Have you always wanted to start-up a non-profit? Do it!! Have you always wanted to try your hand in business? Do it!!! Some distance (in time) from your poor LSAT score will help you kill several birds with one stone: 1) you regain confidence and perspective; 2) you obtain invaluable and interesting experience; and 3) you become a more attractive law school candidate.

A good number of law school applicants, for example, are poli sci majors with only a few years of paralegal experience. Make yourself more interesting and attractive. Go sparkle yourself.

4) Transfer. This isn't really a remedy. Rather it's an alternative. Again, transferring is really, really difficult to achieve. Nevertheless, it is still an option. If your LSAT score is low, then apply to a school that would happily accept your low score. One's reject is another's winner. When you get to school, work hard. Work your tail-off! Achieve high A's on all your exams. Rank at the top of your class - only then do you have a shot at successfully transferring to a better school.

But seriously, why do this to yourself? 1L year is pretty miserable as is - there's no need to make it more painful.

5) Become a Foreigner. If the LSAT isn't your thing, another option is to get your law degree from England. I have several colleagues who have done this. They go to Oxford to get their law degree - then they become a lawyer at some high-powered London based international firm (e.g., Allen & Overy, Clifford Chance, etc.).

British schools don't require the LSAT. Rather they ask for demonstration of good writing and solid research skills. In fact, it's necessary to have a Masters degree - or equivalent level of research work/paper completed before starting at an English law school.

If you want to return home-side to practice law, you will probably need to obtain an LLM degree from an American law school. You don't need an LSAT score to be admitted to an LLM program. But if you haven't figured it out already, this route takes a LONG time. I mean medical doctor long.

Get Rid of Law Schools and Bar Exams?

2011-10-25T07:20:00.000-07:00

Abraham Lincoln was a great lawyer. He was a great debater. He was an awesome president.

But Lincoln did not go to law school. He did an apprenticeship under a more experienced practitioner; he learned on the job. In all honesty, learning on the job is exactly what freshly minted lawyers do today. Most (if not all) recent law school grads will admit that they know little to nothing about real law practice.

Today, one of my clients sent me a NY Times article entitled - "Are Law Schools and Bar Exams Necessary?"

Yes and no. Yes, since a formalized/standardized process will help filter and vet the good from the bad. No, since the system is broke; perhaps a free-market type of system would do better.

At the end of the day, I agree with the latter - perhaps law schools and bar exams aren't necessary. Perhaps we'd have a higher quality legal service and at the same time achieve cost efficiency.

Unfortunately, I don't see the system going away. But these types of questions and thoughts are good wake-up calls to those who champion the system.

October 2011 LSAT | Score Release

2011-10-24T14:03:00.000-07:00

I've been fielding questions all morning and afternoon regarding score release.

This morning LSAC distributed the 2011 October LSAT to all licensed LSAT prep companies. Soon after LSAC followed up with another message telling us all NOT to distribute the test information to students because scores will NOT be released today (Oct 24).

But I just got a message from a student that her LSAT box turned gray. Score probably WILL BE RELEASED today.

Wow~ 5K Zombie Run!

2011-10-20T05:23:00.001-07:00

WARNING: THE CONTENTS OF THE INFORMATION BELOW MAY BE TOO GRUESOME FOR SOME. PLEASE KEEP YOUR CHILDREN AWAY FROM THE COMPUTER BEFORE PROCEEDING.

Those that know me well, know that I'm into zombie movies, tv shows, and video games. Normally, I'd be sheepish about admitting this sort of thing. But everyone, around me, is into zombies. For example, my brothers own all the zombie movies and video games you can think of; my good friend, Steve Yeun, plays Glenn on the hit show The Walking Dead; my girlfriend reads and devours (figuratively speaking) all things zombie.

What can I say, it's destiny.

Anyhow. My younger brother just sent me this http://runforyourlives.com/, with the following message: "Man! I so would've signed up to run for this, if I knew beforehand! Guess I'll just have to wait until next year."

It's almost Halloween. And the zombie craze, world-wide, is growing. So I suppose it only makes sense to have a 5K run with zombies chasing you!

Call me weird (aren't we all?), but I really got excited over this. I share my brother's sentiment - I would've so signed up! For those studying for the big exam, this 5K race is a great stress reliever as well as a way of putting things into greater perspective - i.e., what's worse, getting your brain eaten by the exam or by a zombie?

5 Regrets on Deathbed | 5 Things to Consider Before Grad School

2011-10-19T14:49:00.000-07:00

I read this today. Thanks to John Abodeely for sharing. There are top 5 regrets people have on their deathbeds. Whichever grad school program you are applying to, please think long term. Don't be short-sighted. There's more to life than "success" and "achievements."

To my clients, please remember to keep the greater perspective in mind.

By Bronnie Ware (who worked for years nursing the dying)

1. I wish I'd had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me.
This was the most common regret of all. When people realise that their life is almost over and look back clearly on it, it is easy to see how many dreams have gone unfulfilled. Most people have had not honoured even a half of their dreams and had to die knowing that it was due to choices they had made, or not made. It is very important to try and honour at least some of your dreams along the way. From the moment that you lose your health, it is too late. Health brings a freedom very few realise, until they no longer have it.

2. I wish I didn't work so hard.
This came from every male patient that I nursed. They missed their children's youth and their partner's companionship. Women also spoke of this regret. But as most were from an older generation, many of the female patients had not been breadwinners. All of the men I nursed deeply regretted spending so much of their lives on the treadmill of a work existence. By simplifying your lifestyle and making conscious choices along the way, it is possible to not need the income that you think you do. And by creating more space in your life, you become happier and more open to new opportunities, ones more suited to your new lifestyle.

3. I wish I'd had the courage to express my feelings.
Many people suppressed their feelings in order to keep peace with others. As a result, they settled for a mediocre existence and never became who they were truly capable of becoming. Many developed illnesses relating to the bitterness and resentment they carried as a result. We cannot control the reactions of others. However, although people may initially react when you change the way you are by speaking honestly,in the end it raises the relationship to a whole new and healthier level. Either that or it releases the unhealthy relationship from your life. Either way, you win.

4. I wish I had stayed in touch with my friends.
Often they would not truly realise the full benefits of old friends until their dying weeks and it was not always possible to track them down. Many had become so caught up in their own lives that they had let golden friendships slip by over the years. There were many deep regrets about not giving friendships the time and effort that they deserved.Everyone misses their friends when they are dying.
It is common for anyone in a busy lifestyle to let friendships slip.But when you are faced with your approaching death, the physical details of life fall away. People do want to get their financial affairs in order if possible. But it is not money or status that holds the true importance for them. They want to get things in order more for the benefit of those they love. Usually though, they are too ill and weary to ever manage this task. It is all comes down to love and relationships in the end. That is all that remains in the final weeks,love and relationships.

5. I wish that I had let myself be happier.This is a surprisingly common one. Many did not realise until the end that happiness is a choice. They had stayed stuck in old patterns and habits. The so-called 'comfort' of familiarity overflowed into their emotions, as well as their physical lives. Fear of change had them pretending to others, and to their selves, that they were content. When deep within, they longed to laugh properly and have sillyness in their life again.
When you are on your deathbed, what others think of you is a long way from your mind. How wonderful to be able to let go and smile again,long before you are dying.

Note: Above information from www.CharityHealth.org

Interview Tip: Know Your Audience

2011-10-19T08:05:00.000-07:00

A big key to winning a job offer is knowing where the other side is coming from. Whether you are interviewing, involved in negotiations, or even public speaking, the following information can be invaluable. It's also necessary if you hope to connect in any way with other people.

(Law Firm Interview: Fail)

Whether your audience is two people at an office or fifty thousand at a speech, the same technique applies. Figure out the common denominator between you and your audience. In America, talking about the weather is a good start. If you're in China, talking about food is a great start. But these are obvious ones. The more fine and intimate common denominators are more difficult to ascertain. But real winners know how to figure out these golden nuggets. Often, these golden nugget are as simple as connecting at a human level; forget all about all that professional talk and high-minded non-sense. Just get real.

I know countless stories of my clients who end up with terrific jobs, not because of their grades, but because of their hobbies and endeavors outside of their field. Granted, they had the credentials, but so do a lot of people. The folks in charge are always looking for something extra - a common denominator. They themselves may not know that they are looking for it, but as humans, when they see that y'all share a common denominator, your interviewer will jump at you.

My former client, and now friend, Kyle was hired by a top law firm because in addition to doing well in law school, he also had a master's degree in music. This mattered because the partner doing the hiring happened to be a musicologist in his private time. The partner was fully aware of the amount of discipline a degree in music requires. But more importantly, it's the common bond and mutual interest that they both can share outside the grueling legal environment that attracted the partner to Kyle.

Knowing your audience can also help you keep your cool. I recently spoke to an audience of about 200 people. Afterwards, a member of the event staff asked me if I was nervous on stage. I told him, "No. To the contrary, I thoroughly enjoyed it." I wasn't nervous because I knew exactly why my audience was here and I knew exactly what our common denominator was. Knowing your audience will help you fight and prevent nervousness. It also helps you crack the right jokes and ease any tension.

Some examples of law firm interviews, one is an example of failure (see above), while the other is an example of success (see below). Enjoy~

(Law Firm Interview: Success)

Note: I produced the these clips using Xtranormal (it's what Geico once used to produce one of their great commercials).

The Importance of Being a Team Player

2011-10-17T22:25:00.000-07:00

I have always known the importance of having the ability to be a team player, even though I'm an entrepreneur (by day and night) and a lawyer (by training). As a collective, we're all in this together - this game of life. Working together is integral to survival as well as to success.

When studying for the LSAT, some students feel the need to keep things secretive and remain competitive. Not nice. It's like a bad apple that causes the entire barrel to look bad. Most folks are under the vague notion that law is an independent, one-man-gang type of job. I say "vague" because clearly it's not true. Law practice is as much a team game as any business that requires networking and collaborative researching.

Lawyers who think they can just stand on their own two feet ALONE have a hard time succeeding. We all know a jerk partner - the guy that yells and cusses at his associates. Every firm has one. But even these jerks have a basic understanding of team play. They know exactly how far they can push. They run a tight ship and push just enough to get the maximum output, without having droves of associates quit on them. The ones that don't find this balance end-up failing and getting fired from the firm.

In law school, the one-man-show, independent player type loses all friends and goodwill support from classmates. Being a team player is super important for networking and building a good reputation. Otherwise, you lose good connections and business for the future.

I remember once, during my 1L year at the University of Chicago Law School, having to borrow notes from my section mates. I was in the middle of doing my Civ Pro reading, when I accidentally erased my entire two-weeks worth of notes. I was devastated. Those notes were necessary for me to complete my outline for the upcoming exam. It was impossible to acquire those notes again without having to reach out to some classmates and getting their help. I emailed my entire Bigelow section - there were only 30 or so of us per section.

Karen emailed me back immediately with her notes. So did Rob and Mark. I was so thankful! While my other section mates remained ho-hum or gave all sorts of excuses, these three went above and beyond to support me. They treated me as a fellow classmate - a teammate, if you will, rather than as competition or the enemy.

I don't harbor any negative feelings or emotions against those that didn't help me. But for those that helped me in my dire time of need, I am always ready and willing to go out of my way to help them out. To this day, I feel so thankful and indebted to them.

Be a team player~

LSAT Tips: Improving your memory

2011-10-12T07:38:00.000-07:00

If you are familiar with the LSAT, then you know how much help it is to have a great short-term memory. I often see students waste time and miss questions, for example, on the Analytical Reasoning (Logic Games) section, simply because they forget a small, tiny rule, or fail to retain a deduction from a prior question(s).

The good news is that your memory can be improved! Doesn't matter how old you are - your brain is wonderfully well equipped to adopt and learn new tricks.

Here are some scientifically proven tips:

1. Sleep and Exercise
When you are sleep deprived, your brain cannot perform at full capacity. Key memory connections and enhancements happen during sleep. So get your ZZZ's on.

More exercise, gets oxygen to your brain. So keep running and lifting weights.

2. Spend time with friends and family
As Aristotle famously put it: humans are social animals. Most people think serious puzzles and boring mental exercises, when they think about improving memory. But did you know meaningful relationships promote not only emotional health, but also brain health? A study from the Harvard School of Public Health, for example, found that people with active social lives have the slowest rate of memory decline (see here).

Also, friends and family, usually promote laughter, and laughter is a GREAT memory booster. Unlike emotional responses, laughter activates various areas of your brain all at once~! Laugh at yourself; laugh with friends; just laugh. =)

Here are some great laughing tips and basics from (www.helpguide.org):

Laugh at yourself. Share your embarrassing moments. The best way to take ourselves less seriously is talk about times when we took ourselves too seriously.
When you hear laughter, move toward it. Most of the time, people are very happy to share something funny because it gives them an opportunity to laugh again and feed off the humor you find in it. When you hear laughter, seek it out and ask, “What’s funny?”
Spend time with fun, playful people. These are people who laugh easily–both at themselves and at life’s absurdities–and who routinely find the humor in everyday events. Their playful point of view and laughter are contagious.
Surround yourself with reminders to lighten up. Keep a toy on your desk or in your car. Put up a funny poster in your office. Choose a computer screensaver that makes you laugh. Frame photos of you and your family or friends having fun.
Pay attention to children and emulate them. They are the experts on playing, taking life lightly, and laughing.

3. Stop stressing
Stress is one of the brain's worst enemies. Overtime, stress destroys brain cells, and if left unchecked, it damages the hippocampus, the region of the brain involved in the formation of new memories and retrieval of old one.

Meditation and prayer helps fight stress. So if you're religious, go pray more. If not, then go do yoga. Stress will not only cramp your memory, but it will also kill you. It's almost as bad as smoking.

4. Eat brain boosting food
Just as your body needs fuel, so does the brain. Fruits and vegetables, wine, and omega-3s (found in fish) - these health foods help not only in improving your body, but also your memory! So be sure to eat the right food.

5. Brain exercise
You don't need to be doing LSAT problem after LSAT problem to improve your memory. There are plenty of other methods. As long as the activity/exercise involves meets the following three criteria, your memory is going to improve:

It's new. No matter how intellectually demanding the activity, if it's something you're already good at, it's not a good brain exercise. You need to do something unfamiliar and out of your comfort zone.
It's challenging. Anything that takes some mental effort and expands your knowledge will work. New language, instrument, or sports...or even Sudoku and crossword puzzles.
It's fun. The more interested and engaged you are in the activity, the more likely you'll be able to continue doing it, and the greater the benefits of your experience. So make sure it's challenging, but not too difficult or unpleasant that you dread doing it.

Now that I've shared these memories improvement tips with you, go and implement them! Go boost your LSAT score!

Litigation Rockstar

2011-10-05T06:29:00.000-07:00

I keep posted on what's going on in legal-pop news, mainly for the benefit of my clients. But also, I admit, it's insanely addicting to eavesdrop on legal gossip.

So the latest "talent poaching" news on the street is Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan (the litigation powerhouse) got Andrew Schapiro to jump ships from his former Chicago based law firm Mayer Brown (not only a national player, but one of the big three in Chicago).

Most of you probably don't know Andrew Schapiro. But you've probably heard of the case that he's famous for - "Google (YouTube) vs Viacom". Mr. Schapiro's jump to Quinn now makes Quinn even more formidable. If I ever get into a billion dollar legal battle with anyone, Quinn is on my top 5 list of firms to contact.

Another legal rockstar to keep on eye on is Andrew Schapiro's co-counsel for the Google vs Viacom case, David Kramer from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosti (THE premier venture capital & private equity law firm). Kramer is a genius - I had the pleasure of hearing this guy speak on the YouTube case during the summer of 2009 (before the successful outcome). He had such an iron-lock grip and handle on the matter. I wasn't surprised, even the least bit, with the outcome of the case.

One day, one of you will become a legal rockstar. When you do, don't forget your LSAT instructor.

Post LSAT | Joy, Blues, and Relief

2011-10-03T06:43:00.000-07:00

The first Monday after the LSAT. You've had time to process your feelings and thoughts. Generally speaking, I discourage students from making any "rash" decisions (i.e., cancelling scores or registering for the December LSAT) until they've had time to reflect on Saturday's performance.

After taking the LSAT there are three types of reactions: 1) Frustration; 2) Qualification; and/or 3) Elation. I have some advice for each and every response.

Frustration. Folks who feel frustrated are usually pissed at their performance or at some distraction that caused their poor performance. Some of you just cried. For some particular reason (I'm sure you have no problem pin-pointing the exact reason) you didn't perform at your optimal level. You expected the first section to be games, but it was reading comprehension (or vice versa). Or perhaps your proctor was a freakin' loud mouth. Whatever the reason, you walked out the exam thinking, "How do I register for the December exam?"

If you fall under this category, then it's a good idea for you to pause and reflect on your performance this past Saturday. It's going to help you to do this, especially if you should decide to retake the test again. The most invaluable experience you can garner, from this past Saturday's LSAT, is to understand how you perform under pressure and to understand what type of "unexpected" distractions to expect. Walking into the next exam, you want the advantage of knowing everything - not just the test itself, but all the other external and internal distractions.

But also, you want to reflect because you actually might have done quite well. True story - a former student, whom I taught at Long Beach, CA, called me after her exam in tears. She was devastated. She was convinced that she didn't do well. Nothing I can say or do calmed her down. We eventually hung-up...her feeling no better. 3 weeks later she calls me - she's ELATED. She scored a 171. She ended up at Yale Law.

If you think you want to retake the LSAT, then before you register or pay for the next exam, please call me, email me, or text me. I'd like to walk you through your decision making process, one final time, before you follow through on your decision.

Qualification. Some of you walked out of the exam making qualifications - "I did okay...it wasn't so bad; if I didn't bomb the last passage/game, which I probably didn't, then I'm at my target score!" Basically, you think it could have gone either way. You walk between heaven and hell, when you think about the results. A part of you already began devising Plan B - retake the LSAT in December. But you are also partially convinced that you won't have to derail away from Plan A - get the results and apply to law school right away!

If you fall under this particular category, there really isn't much for you to do, but wait. It really could have gone either way. Don't think about Plan B, for now. Instead, continue living Plan A - keep working on your personal statement and applications.

When your LSAT score is released, call me, email me or text me. We'll discuss how to move forward.

Elation. On the one hand, you might be feeling this way because you aced the LSAT and hit your target score. But on the other hand, there is the possibility that you are wrong - you might be resting on a false sense of security. Either way, this is the best reaction (of the three). You obviously shouldn't register for the next LSAT. Keep hacking away at your personal statement and your application.

Whatever your reaction, I think it's important to pause and reflect. Also, you're probably feeling a bit empty inside. For most who studied their tails off, you suddenly don't know what to do with all your extra time. Don't worry - you'll get used to living life without the LSAT. Your feelings of attachment will vanish soon enough. I just hope you can replace your LSAT study time with something healthy - like working out or finishing up law school applications.

Keep in touch.

Photo Policy

2011-09-28T07:53:00.000-07:00

Be sure no one else is in your picture!

For those of you who haven't taken the LSAT recently, don't be caught unaware - there is a new photo policy. Be sure to take a 2 x 2 photo showing your face and shoulder. It's gotta be a recent picture - if you have a beard now, the picture better have a beard also.

Here is the excerpt from LSAC website with the exact instructions:

In addition, all candidates must attach to their ticket a recent photograph (taken within the last six months) showing only the face and shoulders. The photograph must be clear enough so there is no doubt about the test taker's identity, and must be no larger than 2 x 2 inches (5 x 5 cm) and no smaller than 1 x 1 inch (3 x 3 cm). Your face in the photo must show you as you look on the day of the test (for example, with or without a beard). LSAC provides examples of acceptable and unacceptable photos. The photograph will be retained by LSAC only as long as needed to assure the authenticity of test scores and to protect the integrity of the testing process.

Keep it light and easy everyone!

LSAT Countdown - 5 Last Minute Tips

2011-09-20T03:45:00.000-07:00

The LSAT is around the corner. Here are some last minute tips to reduce "freak outs" and really squeeze the most out of yourself on the day of the exam:

Regimented Routine. Minimize "unknown" variables for the morning of the exam. For example, know what song you'll listen to while in the shower; know what you'll eat for breakfast; know what you're read to warm-up your brain. Know, know and know as much as possible, and live it for the next week (or so).
Wake-up Early. Besides the June exam, every other LSAT is proctored early in the morning. For most of us, our brains aren't really functioning so early in the morning. This means you ought to wake-up even earlier so that your brain has time to gear-up and warm-up.
Sleep Earlier. Practice going to bed; at least by 10PM. Don't take pills, unless you've already been taking pills. Instead count sheep or do whatever else that induces sleep. Some people get anxious the night before the exam. So practice now.
Golden Middle. Don't take a practice exam everyday. On the other hand, don't go cold turkey either. You want to keep it in the nice warm middle.
Avoid pissy people. Seriously. You don't need the negative energy. A HUGE part of doing well on the LSAT is keeping a happy, focused and confident mindset. Shut all those pissers out.

Let me know if you have any questions!

A-list Law Firm of 2011: Hughes Hubbarb & Reed LLP

2011-09-14T03:36:00.000-07:00

Most LSAT students don't know much about law firms. But soon you will. Just as now you're a whiz on law school rankings, you'll soon become a whiz on law firm rankings.

Some firms are great at litigating. Some firms are amazing deal-makers. Some firms are more international than the United Nations.

But there are some law firms that are simply elite. Associates and partners that work at these elite firms are the envy of other associates and partners at the other firms.

What makes a law firm elite? Well, according to the American Lawyer it's not enough to be a high grossing and high powered law firm. Elite firms treat their people right (i.e., life style, hours, etc.). Moreover, they treat their clients right (i.e., pro-bono work, etc.). If you get right grades during your 1L year, strongly consider working for these firms.

The general policy is that if you get trained at these elite firms, you can always lateral into any other "lesser elite" firm.

The top 5 elite A-list firms of 2011:

Hughes Hubbarb & Reed (New York)
Munger, Tolles & Olson (Los Angeles)
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker (Los Angeles)
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher (Los Angeles)
Debevoise & Plimpton (New York)

A law firm that meets your spiritual needs?

2011-09-13T18:01:00.000-07:00

Baker McKenzie, founded and headquartered in Chicago, is one of the largest law firms in the world. Unlike other US based international firms, wherein the US headquarter calls all the shots, Baker McKenzie enables each international office to call their own shots. There are extreme benefits as well as severe drawbacks to this model.

Today I learned that Baker McKenzie (Tokyo, Japan) has hired a spiritual guru to help its lawyers and staff find inner peace and happiness.

When I worked at a law firm, I enjoyed all I can drink soda-pop, Starbucks coffee (though I never took advantage of this one), and free-dinner after 7:00PM. But I never heard of a law firm providing access to a spiritual guru until today.

Despite the economic downturn, those lawyers who can retain their big law jobs are still be spoiled and spattered with goodies.

October 2011 - Changing Test Date and Center

2011-09-10T18:50:00.000-07:00

September 11, 2011 - the tenth year anniversary of the tragic incident.

It is also the last day for you to change your LSAT test date and/or center. Do it by midnight, or else the only other options left are (1) to be absent or (2) to withdraw.

If you're not scoring within the range that you want AND you know that you will wisely use the extra time you gain, then your changing test date makes sense. BUT be realistic as well. Some people change test dates simply because they're scared. Yet no matter how many more months they study, their score may not go up significantly. Consult your LSAT instructor, if you have a hard time being objective.

Keeping Time on Test Day | LSAT Timer vs. LSAT Watch

2011-09-09T07:30:00.000-07:00

Once upon a time it was okay to take a timer into the LSAT. But then, LSAC got harsh and decided to ban them (along with mechanical pencils and iPods)!

"To prevent cheating," was the reason for banning these "modern" marvels. But honestly, how do you cheat with an oven timer? It doesn't even have wifi capabilities. I suppose someone somewhere found the way because LSAC (in my experience) is very fair about things like this (i.e., they still allow highlighters and small snacks - as long as they fit into those tiny sandwich bags acceptable for airport security).

A student asked me this morning, "What's a good alternative?"

UPDATE: (9/25/2011) One of my students just bought an analog watch specifically designed for the LSAT. He hasn't received it yet, so review of the product is still pending. But if you're interested, you can check it out and buy it here: http://lsatwatch.webs.com/.

UPDATE: (10/26/2011)

LSAT Watch
The student who purchased the LSAT watch from http://lsatwatch.webs.com/ liked his purchase. He also let me play with it right before his exam. It is basically a watch that has a convenient interface designed specifically to accommodate you and keep you accountable for the 35 minute LSAT time limit. My only real qualm is that the watch is a bit pricey - $25.00.

LSAT Timer
Here a slighter cheaper, but just as effective alternative option: http://www.LSATtimer.com. I found them via twitter. Each watch is $19.95 (or you can buy two for $34.95). It seems like a similar option. So between the two, I'd go with LSAT Timer. [Coupon Code: LSATsensei]. See here.

Original Post: Here's a good alternative: a cheap analog watch (especially if you don't already own a analog watch already).

I found a $6 watch from Casio (after shipping costs the total hovers around $11). You can compare the price of the watch from different vendors here.You can buy one of these watches, set both the minute and hour hands to 12, and clock yourself during test date~ In fact, I would buy it now, and begin practicing now.

But, if you don't want to deal with all the hassle (you're already stressed out as is), I'd go ahead and buy one of those pre-set easy to use watches from LSAT Timer.

Crazy Games

2011-08-24T04:51:00.000-07:00

Here are some of the harder, killer logic games:

1. PrepTest 7 (February 1993), Game 3 - Judges voting for/against Datalog Corp (Grouping: Division)

2. SuperPrep PT A (February 1996), Game 4 - Oval and Rectangular, Wool and Silk Rugs (Grouping: Selection)

3. PrepTest 25 (June 1998), Game 2 - Multilingual Tourists and Guides (Grouping: Matching)

4. PrepTest 27 (December 1998), Game 2 - Lizards and Snakes Housing (Hybrid: Ordering + Matching)

5. PrepTest 28 (June 1999), Game 2 - Rundi, Swahili, Tigrinya, Yoruba (Grouping: Matching)

6. SuperPrep PT C (February 2000), Game 4 - Dynamite Motors and Assembly (Grouping: Matching)

7. PrepTest 31 (June 2000), Game 2 - Jazz, Opera, Rap, Soul and Pop CDs (Grouping: Selection)

8. PrepTest 36 (December 2001), Game 3 - Bus Window and Aisle Seating (Linear: Stacking)

9 PrepTest 40 (June 2003), Game 3 - Flight Connection: Honolulu, Montreal, etc. (Rare: Mapping)

10. Prep Test 57 (June 2009), Game 3 - Mauve Dinosaur (Hybrid: Selection + Matching)

International Law and Diplomacy | Georgetown Basketball in China

2011-08-20T05:50:00.000-07:00

International Law and Diplomacy piques many aspiring law students' interests. China is especially a hot topic. But alas, all is fun and games, until someone gets hurt.

This past week President Joe Biden went to visit China for peace talks. Diplomacy often involves sharing cultural resources (see here) and performing joint activities (i.e., ping pong tournament - remember Forrest Gump?). During Biden's visit, the US government sponsored Georgetown's basketball team, so that they can play friendly games with their Chinese counterparts. The intention was good. Anyone whose been to China knows how much the Chinese love basketball. There's a reason why Yao Ming is a national hero in China.

However, in hindsight, despite all the good intentions, it was probably a bad idea to entrust a piece of US diplomacy in the hands of adrenaline pumping college boys.

It was extremely upsetting to see our boys get pummeled and slammed with chairs (see here). I'm sure it was equally upsetting for the Chinese to see their boys punched. Hopefully this doesn't add too much fuel to the already high tension between the US and China.

But who am I kidding? I'm in DC right now. Last night I was eating dinner with my friends at a Korean BBQ restaurant, when a group of Chinese men walked in and sat at the table next to ours. Recently made aware of the Georgetown brawl in China, one of my friends grunted under his breath: "Dang Chinks."

Those Chinese men sitting next to us most likely had nothing to do with the recent Georgetown/Chinese Brawl. But such is nationalism - we project our pride and anger against even those that have no direct connection to the hateful event.

Personally, I feel that if you are privileged enough to have obtained a college degree, then you are smart enough to know how to handle yourself - for the sake of peace keeping. It's our duty, as the privileged, to help ease the tension and cool the fire. Because we're human, we are bound to flare up in bouts of anger here and there. But there is no justification for prolonging it. Staying pissed and angry will literally eat you alive.

A lil' unsolicited advice for those of us engaged (or will soon be engaged) in international law and diplomacy, what you do to "clean-up" an international mess is a great opportunity to mend wounds and heal scars. Please do your country a favor and check your anger.

I often joke around about this - but in all seriousness, the best glue that'll bring peace between two nations is a common enemy (for example, aliens from outer space).

Interesting side not - there really isn't much legal action that our boys can take against the Chinese players. Why? Well there is no international court system that can effectively hear or enforce tort law and cases arising between two individuals (of different nationalities).

Personal Statement | Good Topics

2011-08-09T19:48:00.000-07:00

For most people the biggest struggle (when starting their application) is finding a good topic for their personal statement.

It's not easy.

When I was trying to drum up a topic for my personal statement, I was still in the Peace Corps (in China). Some would call being in the Peace Corps a perfect environment to come up with a sexy personal statement - (changing the world, volunteering for a great cause, in a foreign setting, etc.). But it wasn't easy; it was actually hard.

What to write about? Law schools leave the topic open ended. "I could write about anything," I thought. But for the first time I wished that they'd give me more direction about my writing topic. Though they say I could write about anything, I knew better - I knew that there were good topics and bad topics. And I wasn't gonna have my essay fall under the bad topic category.

One of my buddies said something insightful about writing a good personal statement. It's like good art. You can't really describe it before it's completed. But once completed, everyone will see it and agree that it's good art.

Here's how to get started. First, get it into your head - there is no topic that is perfect for everyone; so don't drive yourself crazy searching for it. You need to find a topic that best shows you off, in your own voice. So sit down and write five (5) introductory paragraphs; each intro paragraph on completely different topics and completely different stories.

For example, my five (5) introductory paragraphs were on:

My experience in Peace Corps China
My grandfather and me
My passion for traveling and international law
My experience volunteering
My non-profit experience

[Over the years, I've read countless personal statements. And I've come to learn that my five (5) introductory paragraphs were common themes amongst those of Asian descent. Sigh. So much for trying to stick out and be special. But if you can manage it, try to stick out (positively). It's good to distinguish yourself from the crowd. Use humor, use creative openings/closings - whatever you've got. If you've got it, flaunt it.]

Once you've completed writing five (5) intro paragraphs, share them with as many people as possible. Have these folks critique and choose the best two (2) of the five (5). Be sure to share it with a diverse group of people. Don't just share it with friends and colleagues. Share it with folks older than you, as well as with kids younger than you. Share it with acquaintances. Share it with people of different ethnic heritage. Get as much input as possible. A successful personal statement, sort of like a New York Times Bestseller, will appeal to the masses.

The two (2) winning intro paragraphs will tell you which voice and topic to run with. WARNING: This is not conclusive or definitive! Your personal statement will evolve as you put pen to paper. Don't be afraid to venture outside the scope and perimeters of your two (2) intro paragraphs.

Personal Statement | The Don'ts

2011-06-17T06:29:00.000-07:00

There's a lot of confusion about what the personal statement ought to be (or ought not be). Some quick bullet points about what they ought NOT be:

A chronological exposition of your life and accomplishments
College thesis-esque
About the "most influential person" in your life
A justification of why you deserve to go to law school
A plea to accept you

A good personal statement is personal. It tells the admissions officers at the law school about you and who you are. They want to get an insight into your life that would otherwise not be so apparent through the other aspects of your application. The resume will flaunt your professional as well as other minor/major accomplishments. Your transcript will flaunt your academic accomplishments (or failures). Your personal statement will flaunt your personality, the inner workings of your mind. It's an opportunity for you to show the law schools how great you are without necessarily pointing to career or academic success. You can sorta talk about anything and everything (within 2-3 pages...in Yale Law's case, within 250 words!).

The most successful personal statements cause the reader come to the conclusion that he/she really wants to meet you and get to know you better. Think of a live interview - you can look great on paper (resume and transcript), but if your personality sucks, then you won't get the job. The personal statement = live interview. It is an opportunity for you to convince law schools that you are really a great person.

Mourning into Dancing

2011-06-14T07:00:00.000-07:00

The LSAT was last week. Some of you are still licking your wounds. Others are glowing from the after affects - eagerly awaiting your results. Whichever end of the LSAT spectrum you fall onto, I want to pat your back for a task well completed.

Irrespective of where you are on the LSAT journey, it's time that ya'll start thinking about law school applications. This is the second phase of your journey to law school. This is where you want to start thinking about financing law school, not just where you hope or want to apply.

Most of you will want (and have) your choice of law schools. These law schools will want you badly. But first, it's your job to initiate and court them. It's like asking a girl/boy out. If you know you want them more than they want you, then it's your job to somehow convince them that they'd be crazy not to be with you.

Now, no one, 0% of the population, wants to be with someone who is mourning and apologizing about their past mistakes. So don't get all hung up on your LSAT score or results. Please move on. Think more about dancing with school you are about to court. Find out what moves your school likes, where they wish to go (in the future), and what is most important to them.

There are plenty of resources to help you find these informations. A good place to start is the law school's very own website. Another good resource is LSAC's official guide to law school (see here). Finally, I highly recommend actually connecting with and talking to someone at the law school. Don't waste time on forums; they are full of people with agendas and chips (on their shoulder). Get it directly from the horses mouth - call the law schools you are interested in and ask them for the contacts of student volunteers that would not mind being contacted RE: questions about the school.

Finally, don't hesitate to reach out to me with any questions. I've been through this journey - I've probably seen it and heart it all.

June LSAT

2011-06-06T05:02:00.001-07:00

LSAT Day! Good luck to all those who studied hard. This is it~!

I will be visiting some of the testing centers to wish ya'll luck.

“Unless” | Necessary Intro

2011-05-27T15:41:00.001-07:00

Unless | Diagramming

The part of the statement introduced by "unless" is the necessary condition ('right side' of the arrow), and the other part of the statement is the sufficient condition ('left side' of the arrow). HOWEVER, there is a tiny twist – you must negate the sufficient condition.

For example:

"Obama will join the circus, unless he wins the election."

~OJ à WE

(OJ = Obama Joins; WE = Wins Election)

If the sufficient condition is already in a negative state (like below), then you have a double negative (double negative = positive).

For example:

"Lady Gaga won't sing, unless she is allowed to wear her specialty bra."

LG à WS

(LG = Lady Gaga sing; WS = Wear Specialty bra)

The word "until" is a logical equivalent of "unless".

For example:

"Until you buy a chair, we will sit on the floor"

~SF à BC

(SF = Sit on Floor; BC = Buy Chair)

Unless | Exercise

Attempt to diagram the following examples:

1. Computers are useful unless you are computer illiterate.

2. Mike wants to crown himself "King of the Rocks," unless Phoebe changes her mind.

3. Professor Gellar will not rest until she receives tenure.

4. Unless you can eat an entire hot dog by yourself, don't order the French fries.

5. Until you can prove the existence of your girlfriend, I will not believe a word you say about her beauty.

Second Class Lawyers

2011-05-27T05:36:00.000-07:00

How much lower can the legal profession stoop? With the economic downturn many lawyers have no choice but to sell their pride and body for very, very low pay.

But recently I was made aware (thanks Dale) of a new low - law school grads are accepting jobs from big prestigious firms (I mean top notch) that are paying approximately $60,000 salaries (less than half the normal starting pay!...FYI $160,000 is the normal starting salary at top notch firms) and revoking, from the outset, all hopes and privilege of making partnership. See here.

Frankly this isn't as bad as being a contract attorney - where you do all the dirty work for not only low pay and no promise of partnership, but also no job security.

At the very least this new non-partnership track provides some stability, better-work experience, an office and business cards. Even so, it's discouraging.

For those of you applying to law school - please get into this with your eyes wide open! If you are shooting to make top dollars at a white-shoe law firm from the get-go, then you must go to a top law school and graduate at least in the top third of your class. Otherwise, I sincerely hope you're doing this because the law practice is your calling.

Fresh College Grads Unemployed

2011-05-23T11:22:00.000-07:00

Too many fresh college grads are unemployed. Reports have placed unemployment for the under-25 group at a whopping 54%!

It's estimated that this year some 85% of fresh college grads will be moving back into their parents home. What the heck does this have to do with law school? Lots! (If you're my student, then I encourage you to "read my mind" and anticipate my response - it's good Reading Comp and Logical Reasoning exercise).
Unemployment usually means more law school applicants. This economic downturn is no exception. Unemployed undergrads that move into their parents' homes are usually desperate and willing to do anything to rehabilitate their lost pride. Even if it means jumping head first into $200,000 worth of debt for a degree that doesn't even guarantee a job! (See here).

I don't encourage law school as a default option. You ought to really carefully assess your options and make an informed decision. Don't choose law school just because you have nothing better to do (but then again, don't choose law school just because you'd get an extra ego boost when you walk into a room and flaunt your J.D. - this gets old really fast).

We really need to do something about this economy. Young bloods jobless, restless and cooped up in their cramped childhood bedroom...it's the perfect recipe for a violent and bloody riot. I don't want that.

Best LSAT Prep Books | Mandatory for Studying w/ LSAT Sensei

2011-05-23T08:44:00.000-07:00

Don't veer far from the real deal. At the very least, 99% of your LSAT study should be based on real LSAT questions. Fake questions and/or exercises can be useful for drilling purposes (but for drilling purposes only). To adequately prepare for battle you can't keep using fake guns and swords.

Here are (hands down) the best LSAT prep books - simply because within its pages you will find the REAL deal ONLY:

10 Actual, Official LSAT PrepTest by LSAC (PrepTest 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 18).

old design new design

10 More, Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests by LSAC (PrepTest 19-28)

old design new design

The Next 10 Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests by LSAC (PrepTests 29-38)

old design new design

10 New Actual LSAT PrepTests w/Comparative Reading by LSAC (PrepTests 52-61)

PrepTest 52-61 | 10 New Actual LSAT PrepTests w/Comparative Reading ™

2011-05-23T08:29:00.000-07:00

For those of you who are still caught unaware, LSAC has recently released a new "10 Real LSAT" book. It's called:

10 New Actual LSAT PrepTests w/Comparative Reading

Doesn't it blow your mind at just how creative these folks are with the names for these books? But then again, we are a risk adverse bunch (us lawyers), so why take a risk, especially if there's room for misinterpretation?

The new book covers PrepTest 52-61! This means you don't have to spend $8.00 to $10.00 a pop for some of the newest and most recently released LSAT questions. As of May 23, 2011, Amazon still doesn't carry the this book. So go directly to www.lsac.org to purchase the book.

LSAT FAQ

2011-05-19T07:00:00.000-07:00

Some frequently asked questions RE: LSAT.

What is the LSAT?
It's a half-day long exam taken for law school admissions. It has four (4) scored sections: two (2) logical reasoning, one (1) analytical reasoning, and one (1) reading comprehension. There is also a fifth un-scored, experimental section, which could be anything - logical reasoning, analytical reasoning, or reading comp. Finally, there is a writing section, which is also un-scored.

What does the LSAT measure?
It measures how well you will do during the first-year of law school. There are debates as to just how accurate the LSAT is in measuring law school performance. But for our purposes it doesn't matter who is right or wrong. If you want to go to law school, commit to a schedule and study hard.

What is tested on the LSAT?
Three things are tested - logic, reading and discipline.

Everyone agrees that the LSAT is a logic test. Improving logical thinking (i.e., deductive reasoning) is absolutely necessary for doing well. Knowing some formal logic can help, but this doesn't mean that you have to have a Ph.D in formal logic. Prep test companies have become really good at teaching the core and bare essential logic you need for doing well. If you are studying on your own, here is a good and easy read that'll teach you all the logic you need (and a tad bit more).
Reading ability is yet another aspect tested on the LSAT. Reading accurately and quickly. What is frustrating is that most of us have been reading since we were knee high in height - and yet we still have trouble reading quickly and accurately. Reading skills can be improved - but it takes practice and time.
Discipline. Without it most of folks don't stand a chance on the LSAT. It is impossible to cram on this exam. Over the years, I've learned that the test rewards those who put in the time and effort. But you must study SMART. Foolishly and blindly putting the hours for the sake of putting in the hours is like banging your head against the wall repeatedly. 2-3 hours of study day is sufficient; if you wish/desire to put in more, be sure you are well rested between spurts of study sessions.

What are the possible scores and how are they determined?

You can score anywhere between 120 (lowest) and 180 (highest). Very few people achieve 120 and 180. The vast majority of scores anywhere between 145 and 165. The LSAT is scored on a curve. But the curve isn't based on the performance of your fellow test-takers (at least not the ones taking the test with you on the same day). The curve has been pre-set at least three (3) years prior to you taking your test.

When should I register for the test?

As soon as possible. Seats fill up quick! If you are well beyond your target score, then consult an expert (i.e., your LSAT instructor) before you register and get a realistic assessment as to whether you would actually be able to achieve your target score.

Where can I go to register for the LSAT?

You can register online, via mail, or by telephone. All the information necessary for registering can be found here.

Are there practice tests Available?

There are plenty of practice tests available. The October 1996 and June 2007 tests are available for free! The rest you will have to purchase on your own; you can buy these directly from LSAC or via third-party vendors (i.e., Amazon).

How long should I study for the LSAT?
A very subjective question. But for the most part, you will probably need at least 3 months; ideally 6 months. At that, studying 2-3 hours a day is usually enough. And I don't mean 2-3 hours of studying in front of your computer with YouTube and/or FaceBook on your monitor. I mean 2-3 hours of unadulterated pure study time. If you can focus 100% without being distracted for 2-3 hours - you're a freakin' machine!

JD Envy - Caveat Emptor

2011-05-19T06:59:00.000-07:00

Everyone wants a JD! Year in and year out, I meet countless folks that secretly (or not so secretly) wish they had a law degree.

Yesterday I spoke with someone possessing a Master of Education, who confessed she had JD envy. Last week, my buddy James at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business told me how he would have gone for the JD (had he been "smart enough" to get in). Many current students or recent college grads are all obsessed, driven, and determined to obtain their JDs. Even my banker wishes she had a JD. And why shouldn't everyone want the JD? It signals power, ability and skill to maneuver and navigate through the complex legal web that holds together our entire nation (and globe).

But the irony is that while there are those who are miserable because they don't have it (the JD, that is), there are also those who are miserable because they have it.

There is a lot of misunderstanding enshrouding the JD. As an LSAT tutor, I encounter it everyday.

Here are some of the darker aspects of the JD:

Mid-level Associates Hate Their Jobs (see here)
Is Law School a Losing Game? (see here)
Law Degree Never Used for Sale on eBay (see here)

Option to Withdraw from the LSAT

2011-05-17T05:39:00.000-07:00

A few days ago I read about LSAC's new (and fair) policy of permitting students to withdraw. This is a good turn of events for those students who feel inadequately prepared during the final weeks (or days!) leading up to the exam. Before this new policy, students who were inadequately prepared had only two options - either 1) no show; or 2) cancel. Both options have the drawback of appearing on your final LSAC score report form to law schools.

I actually did a "no show" once (instead of taking the LSAT, I went to watch a movie at the theater). I thought I'd be ready. But as test date approached, I knew that taking the test and having a bad score on my record would be more detrimental than appearing "forgetful" by not showing up on test date. Btw, I wrote a mean addendum when I applied to law school, so I'm sure that helped law schools overlook my "forgetful" no show.

The only major drawback about this new policy is that you only get a partial refund. So what. It's a big test that'll have a big affect on your law school admissions. Losing a few dollars to keep your records clean may not be the worst thing in the world.

LSAT and Asians

2011-05-10T00:09:00.000-07:00

It's 1:17 AM. I should be sleeping since I have an early session tomorrow. But I just finished reading an interesting article about Asians and test taking. Wesley Yang is the author of the fiery article entitled, "Paper Tigers." The main umph of the article is that meritocracy, for Asians, ends as soon as standardized test taking ends. Sad.

I shared the article with many of my Asian brethren. Most identified with it. Sad.

Anyone who knows me, knows that I have several distinct passions in life: the LSAT; my students; and my personal mission to show the world that Asian men (too) can be sexy.

If you knew me since college, then you know about me and my obsession with sexiness. But what do I do for a living? I teach a standardized exam. One of the many stereotypes against Asian men is that we are mindless exam taking robots. We are geeks that rely on rote learning to take tests. If someone who doesn't know me were to judge me based strictly on my job title (LSAT tutor) and my race (Asian), then they'd quickly (and unfairly) jump to the conclusion that I fit the Asian stereotype (to the T).

But ladies and gentlemen, the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the set of facts.

I never thought of myself as the geeky type. I'm very fun loving and extroverted. I always find any excuse to hang-out with people. I play the drums (quite well). I can dance better than most (wanna battle?). And, unlike most geeks, I am not shy about approaching women.

Yes, I am a professional LSAT instructor. But I take great pride in that. I love teaching and I love helping people achieve their law school dreams. I LOVE making a tangible impact on my students' lives. So who cares if teaching the LSAT is an inherently "geeky" business.

Yes, I could have been a lawyer. But sadly, most Asian men who take the law route don't really stand a chance at becoming a partner/leader at their firm (read the article). I take pride in knowing that I had the courage and will-power to escape the biglaw vortex. I am proud that I was able to find my calling and passion (early on in life), and I'm impressed that I was audacious enough to embrace it.

Now, now... I'm not judging Asian men who decide to pursue the typical Asian wishlist careers (i.e., doctor, lawyer, accountant, banker, etc.). To each his own fate. Still, many Asians think that what I'm doing is crazy. Most scratch their head and wonder, "Why teach the LSAT, when you can practice law?"

Perhaps they're right - perhaps I am crazy. But at least I'm happy. Ironically, by professionally teaching the LSAT, I am taking the road less traveled by Asians.

Changing America's Law Schools

2011-05-08T00:57:00.000-07:00

After a recent meeting of the American Bar Association (ABA) in Chicago, support is growing for a proposal that would set fresh law school grads on better (more economically stable) paths.

Finally, the "higher ups" are doing something about the mess!

Many law school grads feel lied to. They feel cheated. Mainly because they come out of school with no jobs. Law schools shamelessly flaunt their rosy employment statistics to lure prospective students into their legal mill-house.

Some (not all) top law school grads land big-law jobs that pay $160,000/year. I don't know any other profession in America that forks over such a high base salary to its starting associates. Law schools use this enticing fact to make legal education seem more attractive than it actually is.

Law schools ought to stay silent and keep their hands folded. Even without their encouragement, plenty of folks will apply to law school because lawyers are glorified and well respected in American society. My Jewish friend calls lawyers, "the new high priests." He was quoting Al Pacino, who plays a big-law partner in the movie Devil's Advocate. Alexis De Tocqueville, the political-philosopher, calls lawyers the "aristocracy" of America. Thus, despite all the jib-jabs and crude jokes against lawyers, people actually (if not openly, then definitely secretly) revere lawyers.

Perhaps the JD should run on a career-match system similar to the MD. Medical doctors match into residency and fellowship. This means that there are a limited number of hospital spots available for newly minted doctors to enter and train within. The medical profession is able to control unnecessary inflation of doctors in this manner. As long as the match system persists, there will never be too many doctors in America - the way there are too many lawyers in America.

I sincerely hope we resolve this matter sooner - rather than later.

June 2011 LSAT - Important Deadlines!

2011-05-06T07:17:00.000-07:00

During Christmas season, you never want to be one of the last ones running into the shopping mall because all the good "stuff" are gone. Likewise, you don't want to be one of the last ones to register for the LSAT because all the good test centers will be GONE!

Few important deadlines are coming up next week. Please, please, please REGISTER this week (if you haven't done so already)! Do everything before next Friday (May 13th) - FRIDAY THE 13TH!

Registration Deadline:

Late Registration Online or by Telephone

May 13, 2011 (receipt deadline)

Deadline for Changing Test Date:

Test Date Change by Mail, Phone, or Fax	May 13, 2011 (receipt deadline)
Test Date Change Online	May 15, 2011 (midnight ET)

Deadline for Changing Test Center:

Test Center Change by Mail, Phone, or Fax	May 13, 2011 (receipt deadline)
Test Center Change Online	May 15, 2011 (midnight ET)

Deadline for (partial) Refund:

LSAT Registration Refunds (partial only)

May 13, 2011 (receipt deadline)

1L Prep Books

2011-04-25T16:14:00.000-07:00

Aside from Joseph W. Glannon's Civil Procedure: Examples & Explanations, here are some other good 1L prep books. If you have more questions, feel free to contact me david@lsatsensei.com.

The Law of Torts: Examples & Explanations by Joseph W. Glannon
Property: Examples & Explanations by Barlow Bruke and Joseph Snoe
Understanding Property Law by John G. Sprankling
Contracts: Examples & Explanations by Brian A. Blum
Criminal Law: Examples & Explanations by Richard G. Singer
Writing a Legal Memo by John Bronsteen
Getting to Maybe: How to Excel on Law School Exams by Richard Michael Fischl and Jeremy Paul

The Examples & Explanations series is (generally speaking) quite reliable. But my favorite E&E author is Joseph Glannon - read the books and I'm sure most of you will concur that Glannon is the best at distilling information into bite-size, understandable nuggets.

The 10,000-Hour Rule

2011-04-03T22:58:00.000-07:00

"If you put 10,000 hours into a task, you will become an expert at it."

I thoroughly enjoyed reading Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers. I especially enjoyed the chapter about "The 10,000-Hour Rule." The book explores how some of the world's most renown geniuses (a.k.a. outliers), like Bill Gates and Joe Flom (= the name partner from the uber prestigious law firm, Skadden, Arps, Meagher & Flom, LLP & Affiliates), became geniuses. Were they born special? Or did they become special? Read the book - it does a good job of explaining how some geniuses are made; not born.

Over the years, I put way more than 10,000 hours into the LSAT. I've analyzed every single test in existence (forward and backward) from every imaginable angle. I can explain every single LSAT question in at least 18 different ways. And I consistently score a 180 on all tests, even the new ones I've never seen before. I attribute my LSAT genius to the massive number of hours I put into it.

Other books by Gladwell that I recommend, if you haven't read them already, Tipping Point and Blink.

US News Ranking - Legitimate?

2011-04-01T12:17:00.000-07:00

Law school rankings are useful to a certain extent. But relying on them too heavily in making law school decisions is a bit short sighted. But I am not going to discourage my students (or you) from relying on rankings. I merely ask my students (and you) to be an informed and educated consumer. Always question what you read - and be critical.

For the past twenty years, each spring, the US News & World Report has published an annual ranking of law schools. Initially, the law schools didn't care. But as applicants and prospective students began putting more weight on the US News rankings, law schools (i.e., deans and administrators) began feeling the pressure to increase or maintain their rank.

Over time, US News has encouraged bad behavior among law schools - administrators are tempted to rig numbers just to obtain a higher rank. Case in point - Villanova University School of Law. This law school (voluntarily) announced that it had knowingly reported false LSAT and GPA information to the American Bar Association prior to 2010 - all in an effort to impact its rankings. (But let's not be too harsh on Villanova. They did the right thing by admitting to their guilt. There could be other schools out there making the same mistake, but refusing to come clean).

Another interesting tid-bit about US News rankings is how "disgusted" law school deans have responded - on the one hand, they became signatories to an annual letter that criticizes the publication yet, on the other hand, they gloated and celebrated with press releases about moving up on the ranks. A handful of law school bloggers (not me) made a sport of linking the two documents together and pointing out the hypocrisy. The Law School Admissions Council (LSAC), who distributed the annual signed letter, redacted the names of the deans from the letter; eventually the Deans' letter just went away completely. Sad.

Some (like Professor Brain Leiter) have responded by making their own ranking. But responding "eye for an eye" rarely resolves the fundamental problem. If anything trying to outdo the US News rankings with another "better" ranking system, only reinforces and perpetuates the problem.

Quite honestly, I don't think the rankings are gonna go away. It's human nature to rank. Although as Americans we don't like to be ranked (especially if we're not gonna be on top), there's no denying that it happens in everyone's mind to some degree.

Economy bouncing back up? Well, law firms hiring again.

2011-03-18T07:39:00.000-07:00

G ood news from NALP (National Association for Legal Professionals). Law firm hiring has jumped up to 87% in 2010. Offer rates to summer associates were really really low in 2009 (69%).

This is good news for rising 1L's and the 2L's that are summering this summer!

No Regrets - Do Your Best on the LSAT!

2011-03-15T23:31:00.000-07:00

Regrets. Don't we all have them? If I had a time machine, there are definite episodes of my life that I'd like to make amends to.

Today, while teaching a series of students, one of them said, "I don't really care to much if I don't do so well [on the LSAT] - I'll just transfer from tier 3 to Harvard." No disrespect to my student, but that was one of the most ridiculous things I heard all day.

And I told him just that - "You're being ridiculous!"

First off, transferring is NOT easy. I know plenty of transfer students, and they all agree with what I'm about to say. It is far easier and less stressful to try and get admitted into a top school with a good LSAT score than it is with stellar law school grades.

EVERYONE thinks they will do much better in law school than they did on the LSAT. But folks, remember, law school is full of highly motivated and intellectually charged gunners. It's not like college (or anything else you've encountered). Working "hard" is just not enough. It's a different beast and there's no guarantee that you'll do well just because you were the smartest in your college class.

Don't half-heartedly pursue now, only to regret later. The LSAT is just one episode of your life. Study for it and do your best. I'm not saying give-up your life - keep doing what makes you happy. Just remember to be disciplined enough to put the proper hours into LSAT study.

If you've done your best, then you'll have no regrets. Don't let me catch you saying, "Oh...I know I could have done better if I had been more diligent with my studies."

Props to University of Chicago Law School

2011-03-11T21:53:00.000-08:00

Quite honestly, I didn't have a lot of fun in law school. It was a lot of hard work.

But I'd be remiss to not acknowledge some of the positive attributes about UChicago Law. Lately it's been showing up quite a bit on the blogosphere - faring well in rankings.

As of today it has the best law school loan repayment program.

It is the #1 law school for getting a Biglaw job according to the National Law Journal and #1 law school by Malcolm Gladwell.

Kudos to my law school. But honestly, these rankings don't mean much. I give UChicago props for doing well on the rankings. But in the end, a law school is a law school. At the upper echelon there really isn't much of a practical difference. Trying to differentiate one school from another is like splitting hair.

My advice, if you're choosing a school based on rankings alone, then shame on you! Please do yourself a favor and visit the school, and/or do a little more due diligence (i.e., reach out to currents students or alumnus).

Don't burn out studying for the LSAT

2011-03-06T21:13:00.000-08:00

Usually we have the opposite problem - people don't study enough.

Folks, NEWS FLASH, doing well on the LSAT means that you will need to invest quite a bit of time. And I don't mean just 4 hours every other day, listening to your LSAT instructor and doing exercise problems in class. Assuming you come into the test with a baseline score of somewhere in the 140s - you will probably need to put in approximately 20 hours per week to score in the mid-to-upper 160s.

Notice I didn't say, "Study 24-7!" Notice I didn't say, "Kill yourself studying for the LSAT." Ultimately, it's just a test. You need to have enough perspective to realize that it's just that - a test. Keep your healthy habits and hobbies (BTW, drinking and partying all weekend are not in the list of healthy habits and hobbies). Stay in touch with friends. Go out to eat. Watch a good movie. Do what you normally do to remain happy. Maintaining a positive and happy attitude goes a long way. This will not only help you perform better on the LSAT, but also help you perform better in law school, and then subsequently, as a lawyer.

Seriously, don't burn out.

Memoir of LSAT Sensei

2011-03-02T23:50:00.000-08:00

My name is Dave and I have been teaching the LSAT for nearly a decade. I have literally helped thousands of people achieve their law school dreams. And I have to admit - it always feels really good watching my students' scores jump up. You and I can disagree about the meaning of true happiness, but for me, there are very few things in life that feel as good and satisfying as witnessing a person achieve his/her goals and dreams, especially after much hard-work and perseverance. Perhaps this is the reason why I like sappy, inspirational movies about underdogs.

I love teaching, in general, but I'm passionate about teaching the LSAT (well...as passionate as one can be about a standardized exam). I first discovered my general passion and knack for teaching in China - I was an educational volunteer for the Peace Corps in China. And boy, I was on fire! My students loved me and I absolutely adored them. Everyday I would sweep into the classroom, much like a rock star would sweep across his stage. It was so invigorating to see my students make improvements (no matter how small the improvement). Every time I explain a concept, I saw lights go on in their head. And that made me smile and laugh.

I am somehow able to consistently carry that same fire and enthusiasm into my LSAT classes. It's as though whenever I'm standing in front of students, something inside me clicks on, and I become unstoppable.

Over the years, I've gotten really good at pinpointing people's LSAT mistakes and weaknesses. I am confident that I can help anyone (with a decent college education) gain invaluable LSAT points. On average, my students increase their LSAT score by 14-17 points.

My point here is that I get it. I understand my students' internal struggles and doubts. I walked the road ahead of them and I know exactly how to succeed (and avoid the pitfalls). I love helping people, guiding them the right way, setting them on the correct path, and watching them succeed. In fact, I hope to be teaching until the day I die.

I write on this blog to reach out and help as many people as possible.

Picking Law Schools: Money or Prestige (or both)

2011-02-22T00:59:00.000-08:00

A law student wrote the following to me: "I got in everywhere - including Columbia, NYU, Fordham...I chose to go to Pace Law School. I chose my school for several reasons. Firstly, I received a full scholarship. Second, I chose based on my "fit." Also, Pace has one of the best environmental law programs in the nation. I immensely enjoy law school. I don't regret my choice at all!"

Lower ranked schools buy good students. They will pay scholarship money to entice students with high LSAT and GPA to come. This helps them raise their US News rank. In a down economy opting for the money over prestige, I suppose, makes sense. But even in a down economy I would say you want to weigh your options carefully.

Let's say the above law student wants to work for a big law firm, wants to enter academia, wants to do high-profile public-interest-law cases, wants to work at the US attorney's office, or wants to clerk for the federal court....will she regret her choice? YES! Will doors be closed for her? YES!

Being out of law school with zero debt helps you begin what you love to do sooner. But you have more opportunities coming from a top law school. The best of both worlds is getting into a top school with tons of financial award.

Here are some tip-top schools that give out full-rides:

- Columbia Law School (Hamilton Fellowship)
- University of Chicago Law School (unnamed - but it exists)
- University of Michigan Law School (Darrow Scholarship)
- University of Pennsylvania Law School (Levy Scholarship)
- Cornell University Law School (unnamed - but exists)
- Northwestern University Law School (early decision - if accepted ED, you get $50,000/yr)

There are more schools out there that offer full-rides. I'll occasionally update this list.
-

LSAT | Naked Truths and FAQs

2011-02-17T09:31:00.000-08:00

Naked Truths
Sad truth: studying more will NOT guarantee you better numbers than someone who doesn't study as much.
Happy truth: It will, however, get you better numbers than YOU would have gotten without studying.
-
Sad truth: not everyone can score a 180 on the LSAT.
Happy truth: almost anyone can improve his/her score through intense study.
-
Sad truth: the LSAT is not easy.
Happy truth: the LSAT can be fun - once you get good at it (especially the games section).
-
Sad truth: the LSAT sucks, it's evil, and it's gonna eat up your weekends.
Happy truth: doing well can make your dream come true.
-
Sad truth: law schools place heavy weight upon your LSAT score and your GPA
Happy truth: high LSAT + lousy GPA or lousy LSAT + high GPA will not get you into every top school, but they will get you into a few, since there are schools that are determined to increase their rankings and thus are happy to take students with one or the other.

FAQ RE: LSAT
Q: "Should I take a course?"
A: Yes, you should. It's convenient to think that courses really don't help that much, substantively anyway. It's convenient to think that with a little determination, you can easily do at home what other people are spending more than $1000 to do. But let's face it, most people (you included) don't engage in intense preparation. Studying an hour or two a day is NOT ENOUGH. Prep courses offer you the structure and guidance to engage in intense preparation.

Q: "I signed-up for a course, so that's enough, right?"
A: No. We're talking about your future here. Taking an LSAT course with that attitude is like signing up for a gym and expecting it to do your work for you. "Are you studying for your LSAT?" I ask. "Yup!" says the student. What does he/she mean? It means he/she is taking a course. Maybe a machine will do the sit-ups. "How'd you do?" I ask. "Not as well as I'd hoped," says the student.

Q: "Does my LSAT prep course expect me to finish all my homework?"
A: Yes! All of it. Do all of the homework. Or you're wasting your time. Who is cheating whom? Stop complaining and do the work. The best way to make the case that your grades do not reflect your ability is to get a much higher LSAT score. The best way to get into a better law school than the college you attended is to get a high LSAT score. Not doing your homework is like buying a workout DVD and not really doing anything with it.

Q: "Should I hire a tutor?"
A: Yes. If you are having trouble focusing in class (because your instructor is so sexy) or if you're still having trouble sticking to the schedule, then hire a tutor. It'll be expensive. But it's your future. Good things cost a lot of money. But be warned, there is a ton of instructional malpractice in the LSAT prep industry. This means your LSAT instructor may not have taken the LSAT or even gone to law school.

Q: "Can I improve my score, even if I can't afford to take a course or hire a tutor?"
A. Yes! Do what law students do. Form a study group. Buy good "cheat" books. You are not competing against your friends. Make it large/small. Advertise. Meet every day at a church/synagogue/class room. Before you meet spend three hours answering the same sample exam. During the study session, go over the exam, go around the table and explain, at random or in order, why each answer is correct. Just do it.

High LSAT Score = More Wealth? | 5 Wealthiest Lawyers in America

2010-11-03T05:44:00.000-07:00

Nope! Not necessarily.

Having a high LSAT score may greatly increase your odds of getting a "cushy" big law job fresh out of law school (albeit I don't know if you'd call 80-hour weeks cushy). But attaining a high LSAT score doesn't necessarily equal more wealth.

On Forbes magazine's annual list of 400 Riches People in America, 37 people hold a law degree. Yet the vast majority of these folks did not gain their fortune via law practice; they made their fortune through business (here is the list of ex-lawyers turned billionaires).

One lawyers, however, did make his billion via law practice: Joe Jamail. Over the years this tort king accumulated an estimated wealth of $1.4 billion! The first question on any curious aspiring law student's mind is "Where did he go to law school?" The answer: University of Texas School of Law (LSAT: 164-168; GPA: 3.54-3.87).

Now presenting the list of wealthiest lawyers (based on annual earnings) and their respective law schools (and each law school's LSAT and GPA range):

1. Gerald Hosier ($150 Million)* - DePaul University College of Law (LSAT: 158-162; GPA: 3.11-3.57)
Patent lawyer that earned his millions by representing the late Jerome Lamelson, an inventor with 700+ patents, and Lamelson's heirs. He is based in Las Vegas. He collects airplanes for fun.

2. Fred M. Baron ($21-$45 Million) - University of Texas School of Law (LSAT: 164-168; GPA: 3.54-3.87)
Made his millions in asbestos cases. Was one of the founding/named partners of the Dallas based law firm, Baron & Budd, PC (but he sold his interest in the firm). Very active in the Democratic party.

3. Joe Jamail ($20.7 Million) - University of Texas School of Law (LSAT: 164-168; GPA: 3.54-3.87)
Wealthiest from this list in terms of net worth. He made his fortune litigating tort cases. This guy has a football field named after him! It has been noted that he turned down the litigation case against BP oil spill because he was, "too busy" and "didn't want to deal with it". (I like his style).

4. Willie E. Gary ($12.1 Million) - North Carolina Central University School of Law (LSAT: 157-164; GPA: 3.43-3.73)
Dubbed himself as the "Giant Killer". Made his millions litigating against "giants" like Disney, Microsoft, and Kodak. Son of a migrant worker, this man definitely achieved the American dream.

5. Philip H. Corboy ($11.6 Million) - Loyola University Chicago School of Law (LSAT: 158-162; GPA: 3.29-3.62).
Made his millions litigating personal injury cases in the greater Chicago area for over 50 years. This man is the epitome of tough. When asked about retirement, he is quoted to have said: "I don't play golf well enough, and I don't want to get my hands wet fishing."

One final closing thought. The average US lawyer makes $90,300/year (see here). Mind you that's the average. That means half of the attorneys out there make less than $90,000 a year. This is sad because people don't need to go to law school and acculumate a $160,000 debt just to earn below $90,000/year; plenty of college grads are make between $40,000 - $100,000/year fresh out of school. So unless you know you want to make your living practicing law, perhaps money shouldn't be the reason for law school.

---
*Fact/Figure from America Lawyer (here)
**Facts/Figures for Annual Earnings from Forbes (here)
***Facts/Figures for LSAT and GPA from LSAC (here)

Hidden Gems | "Law schools you can get into without a 165 LSAT score"

2010-10-26T16:38:00.000-07:00

Here is a list of law schools that will impress Uncle Jimmy and that you can get into without a 165 LSAT score or a 3.75 GPA.

1. University of Miami Law School (LSAT: 155-159; GPA: 3.25-3.66)
This school has the advantage of being the 'best law school' in a great, big city. MIAMI - fun city and excellent weather! It has a first-rate faculty, and an awesome president (Donna Shalala). Surprisingly the numbers for this school aren't so tough. Really first-rate legal community - this school, in my opinion, should be ranked higher.

2. Case Western Reserve Law School (LSAT: 157-161; GPA: 3.21 -3.64)
This is the best law school in Cleveland. I know, I know...Lebron James isn't at Cleveland anymore, and maybe Cleveland isn't first on your list of cities to visit. But Cleveland is a big city with a reputation as a powerhouse in corporate America. Also, for those interested in mingling with other grad students, Cleveland has several prestigious medical schools.

3. Chicago-Kent College of Law (LSAT: 157-163; GPA: 3.21-3.69)
Good school in one of the best cities in America! In addition to being able to enjoy Chicago's famous deep-dish pizzas, hot dogs, and Italian beef sandwiches, you get the benefit of interacting with preeminent legal minds (Judge Posner from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals is nearby!). From Chicago's top law firms to the Mayor's office, Chicago-Kent alumnus can be found everywhere.

4. Tulane Law School (LSAT: 160-164; GPA: 3.34-3.7)
Another good school in another amazing city - New Orleans. This law school should be ranked higher. Perhaps it's the civil-law system that keeping it from shooting through the roof. Aside from having a good law school, Tulane has a good medical school and an excellent engineering program.

5. Vermont Law School (LSAT: 152-158; GPA: 3.05-3.57)
If you want to study environmental law, there ain't a better law school. Close to Dartmouth College and only a few hours away from Montreal, Canada, Vermont Law School is not short on source of entertainment. Tell Uncle Jimmy you're going to New England - after all, people just assume that if it's in New England, the school must be hard to get admitted to.

6. Suffolk Law School (LSAT: 154-159; GPA: 3.3-3.6)
US News ranks Suffolk in its "third tier" but that's definitely not what it feels like when you're there. Suffolk has a fabulous building, located right in the heart of downtown Boston. It boasts a terrific faculty, great political connections in Massachusetts, and a top-notch clinical program. If friends ask, just tell them, "I go to school in Boston."

7. Santa Clara University School of Law (LSAT: 157-161; GPA: 3.11-3.61)
If you want to be near Silicon Valley giants, like Google, Inc and Facebook, then definitely look into this school. In fact, many graduates of Santa Clara Law end up working for law firms that have deep connections with venture capital groups, start-up companies and technology firms. Did I mention that it's sunny and really close to San Francisco?

8. Syracuse University College of Law (LSAT: 153-157; GPA: 3.13-3.51)
It's cold, but so is Cornell, and Syracuse is a lot easier to get into, and quite respectable. Joe Biden went there, and if you got a 150 or so, you could do a lot, lot worse, so buckle up and go to work on your personal statement.

9. University of Denver Sturm College of Law (LSAT: 156-161; GPA: 3.27-3.69)
There is more than just skiing in Colorado. It bustles with business activity and Denver (Sturm) Law benefits greatly from it. I heard many great things about this school (location, building, and student body).

10. University of Hawaii at Manoa (LSAT: 155-160; GPA: 3.21-3.68)
Hawaii. Do I really need to explain this? It's law school in paradise. It's the only ABA-accredited law school in all of Hawaii. If you enjoy surfing and you want to possibly practice law where most people go for vacation, then seriously think about it.

*All stats and figures obtained from LSAC.org.

Interview Tips

2009-06-17T12:53:00.000-07:00

Here are some interview tips for law students attempting to get a biglaw job in this economy.

Relax re grades and law review. If you don't have amazing grades and you didn't make law review, then there's really nothing you can do about it. Would it have helped to have good grades and law review on your resume? Yes! Will it preclude you from getting a job to have neither on your records? No, of course not.

If you have mediocre grades and nothing to set you apart from the crowd, then you need to really make the most of the 20-30 minutes interview slot during On-Campus Interview. How do you shine? Here are some tips:

Smile. None of that fake stuff; only the real deal. People know when you're faking your smile.
Do your research and find out not only about the firm (this is easy), but also about the attorney (or recruiter) sent to interview you. How do you do this research? If you have the name of your interviewer in advance, then just go to the the firm's website and search for the person - read up on them and take note of their interests. For example, if you find out that your interviewer is an IP lawyer with a computer science background from UC Berkeley, but now works in NY, then take note of this and prepare to use it as a discussion point. During the interview ask him some questions based on that information (i.e., Why'd you move to NY after studying in CA?). If you don't know who your inteviewer will be, NO PROBLEM! Just do your research during the interview, spend 5-10 minutes of your interview time taking a genuine interest in the person interviewing you.
Think: this isn't about me, it's about the person sitting in front of me. These on-campus interviews are NOT about you. Thinking that the interview is an opportunity for you to show off and sell yourself is the biggest misconception EVER. The interview is SO MUCH more about engaging the interviewer. Instead of focusing on selling yourself, focus on "entertaining" your interviewer. See what about your resume interests them and talk about that, BUT ask many more questions to figure out why they are so intrigued by that particular point. This requires you to be a good reader of body gestures and facial expressions. If you can't grasp their attention, then you've lost the game.

But all of the above is sort of a moot point if you have good grades, law review, and a decent personality - you'll get a job somewhere, somehow, no matter what.

Interviews with Big Law (2008)

2008-10-02T09:56:00.000-07:00

This interview season has been hectic. The current job market has so many people worried and frantic. I've been talking to many of my friends at other law schools. The general consensus is that we're all just very happy to land a job (better if it's a biglaw-Vault ranked job). A bad economy really puts things into perspective.

Last night, while having dinner with a friend, I got a call from the Silicon Valley law firm I interviewed with last week (OFFER!). The night before I got a call from the only Chicago law firm I had applied to (OFFER!). I'm extremely thankful that I am getting job offers. I suppose it goes to show that a law degree does mean something afterall.

Law school doesn't teach the "law," it teaches you how to read and write critically. What's amusing to me is that we're taught to "read, write, and think critically" from day one (in high school). Somehow 8 years of reading, writing and thinking critically (high school + college) was not enough. I'm not be sarcastic here. I really think it's a shame.

But get this, a few months ago, I met with a bunch of Alumni from UChicago's class of 1998. A singular advice that I received from EVERYONE is: become a GREAT writer. I got the impression that NOT all LAWYERS are good writers. It's really really a shame.

So I suppose law school doesn't really teach one how to write - it simply teaches one how to think and read. 3 more years of schooling to become a better reader and writer. And somehow 3 years of reading and writing more justifies us being paid a six digit salary?

Just thinking about this humbles me - I'm so not worthy.

Becoming pale = BAD!

2007-08-19T18:30:00.000-07:00

One of the worst things about starting law school, for me, is leaving my LSAT students in L.A. behind. Getting a good LSAT instructor can be such a coin toss; on the other hand, getting a good bunch of students can be a coin toss also. I've always been blessed with good groups of students. I'm definitely going to miss teaching - I don't intend on teaching during my 1L year (Paragon to Pieces, I give you mad props for being able to teach while studying).
Though summer is winding down (in L.A. it seems to be winding up), I get a bit worried when my students become more pale while I get more tanned. This summer, for the sake of getting in shape before law school, I spent a significant amount of time swimming (both at the pool and at the beach). However, this doesn't quite explain why my students are SOOOO much more pale than I am.

I learned that most of my students were studying 6+ hours everyday for the LSAT (for the past 2 months). My goodness. I wouldn't be surprised if some admitted to NEVER seeing the sun in the last two months.

I'm a strong advocate of balance. Studying and doing well on the LSAT is important. And while people may be able to pull off several weeks (maybe even months or years) of crazy study hours, their body will eventually have to pay the cost.

I have to constantly remind my students that the LSAT, though important, is merely a small detail in the long scheme. If they can't learn to manage the LSAT in a more balanced fashion, what makes them think they'll be able to do it once at law school OR as a lawyer?

Go see the sun...it's pretty. It'll probably help you do better on the LSAT anyways. Plants aren't the only things that need the sun.

Calm before the Storm

2007-08-19T18:03:00.000-07:00

It really feels that way. As my summer approaches an end and as I twiddle my thumbs waiting for law school to begin, I'm thinking, "It's quiet...a little too quiet." My friends that are starting law school this year have already started their orientation.

Thanks to UChicago's quarter system, for me, law school doesn't start for another month.

Sitting here thinking about how I can use my time more productively, I began flirting with the idea of taking the GMAT. Actually, on-and-off, I have thought about getting an MBA in the past. But only today was I serious enough to get onto MBA.com and find out more about the test.

I'm tempted to jump on board the JD/MBA boat. Any thoughts or recommendations on how to go about studying for this while a 1L?

I move to Chicago in about two weeks. I'll be blogging more consistently (I know I will), once I arrive at law school.

Meanwhile, my apologies for the long hiatus. It was summer. I was busy at the beach. =)

LSAT: Doing what is right

2007-08-03T01:57:00.000-07:00

Today I overheard two students in my class chatting over how people have attempted to cheat on the LSAT.

It's amazing the measures some people will take to gain a little "edge" on the test. As I stood there listening to my students, I began to think: isn't it better to spend the time wasted devising a "cheating" method on studying more practice questions? Not to mention the great risk of getting caught.

I keep telling my students that the LSAT is as cheat proof as any test will get. To try and undermine it will require nothing short of Ocean's 11 style planning and execution. And in the end, I just don't think the risk + reward is worth all that effort. If you get caught cheating, you'll NEVER be a lawyer.

Besides, even if you successfully cheat, what kind of lawyer would a cheater make? Definitely not the kind we want in our profession. =)

Anyhow. For anyone out there thinking about cheating for the LSAT, please remember nothing is worth your dignity.

The power of a law school t-shirt

2007-07-03T01:23:00.000-07:00

I haven't even started law school, but I've already witnessed, first-hand, the crippling effect a "prestigious" law degree has upon those who think way too highly of lawyers (or to-be-lawyers).
I went to Blockbuster to rent "Dreamgirls" and "Adaptation."After waiting in line for some time, I finally got to the cash-register and handed the Blockbuster employee my membership card.

"Sir, your Blockbuster Rewards is due to cancel next week. Would you like to renew it right now?"
"What? I just started this program last week."
"No sir, it says right here that you are due to cancel next week." He sounded agitated.

At this point, I stepped back puzzled; trying to figure out if this guy was pulling my leg or actually being serious. Just as I was about to ask for his supervisor, I noticed his eyes widen.

"You're in law school?"
"Uh....yeah."
"I see...(awkward silence)...ummm...let me write a comment here, cause there has clearly been a mistake. I'm sorry about the trouble." He was cordial.

My jaw literally dropped at his sudden change in tone and attitude. When I momentarily stepped back, he saw my t-shirt that had "Law School" written in big bold letters over my chest area.

Sad, ain't it?

Leading up to law school

2007-06-25T15:10:00.000-07:00

The months leading up to law school are restless ones. I have plenty to keep me busy (e.g. working out, teaching, swimming, etc.), but my mind is constantly reverting back to law school thoughts.

Much of my worrying and fretting has stopped - the human body can only be so concerned. I'm not stressed or worried about law school. Just eager to start.

Though I hate to admit it, the adrenline rush I felt last year while applying to law school was much more exciting than this.

Ugh, I'm scheduled to leave for China next week. Then...maybe, just maybe I'll fly to Texas. =)

Why law school?

2007-06-15T09:19:00.000-07:00

I frequently ask my LSAT students, "Why law school?" Of course, as expected, the answers are as eclectic as the bunch. It's, moreover, a great way for me to measure and reflect on my own motive and purpose for going to law school.

"I love to argue and debate." This one always amuses me. I suspect that it's because I can reply with Robert Miller's quote from, Law School Confidential, "You're better off getting married." (I'm such a geek).

How can I leave out the embittered paralegals, whom after decades of being used and abused, finally muster up the courage and time to study for the LSAT. They want the authority and money their boss' possess. "I do all the work, but he takes all the pay!"

There's always that one person who spits back: "I'm doing it for the money."

And the do goody-goods: "I want to change the world."

But I think my all time favorite response was from a blonde female student: "...because there are more lawyer jokes than blonde jokes." This one had me going for a while.

"I wanted to go to law school eversince...." The natural step after elementary school was middle school. The next logical step after that was high school. And after that it was college. After college, however, people panic. A substantial number of these people cling to law school because they see it as a "smooth transition" between college and the real-world. Around 50% of my LSAT students are typically of this background.

I am not in any position to make a judgment call on any of the above responses. But my general opinion is that most people have clouded reasons for going to law school.

Last night I watched the film Patch Adams with my youngest brother. It wasn't about lawyers or law school, but it really made me think how important it is for a person to have a clear vision and reason for wanting to attend law school. Knowing your starting point and ending point simply makes you a more efficient and happy human being.

Prepping for law school

2007-06-04T11:13:00.000-07:00

It's summer! The summer before the big year; the calm before the storm. I've been doing some extensive, albeit informal, research on how I can most effectively use this summer to be in top shape before law school starts. Here are some sound, along with some crazy, advice that I've received thus far:

- "Go on vacation. You'll be asking why you didn't during those long nights"
- "Practice sleeping early"
- "Buy used 1L books and preview by reading EVERYTHING before school starts."
- "Start working out"
- "There's no way you can prep for law school, so just relax and enjoy"
- "Get some legal exposure; work as a para-legal or law clerk"
- "Date as many people as you can"
- "Don't get into a relationship!"
- "Learn to cook"
- "Take a Great Books course; you'll never have time to read real books again"
- "Go on a road-trip"
- "Don't waste time learning how to cook; you won't have time anyways"
- "Put on some pounds....studying makes you lose weight"
- "Make money"

This'll be an interesting summer. Of all the above, I want to go on a road trip (from sea to shining sea) and maybe even go backpacking in Africa or Southeast Asia. But it's very likely that I'll be stuck making money. Maybe I'll go on a brief excursion to Jamaica! My friends there have been begging me to come for some time now.

Prayers

2007-05-23T02:01:00.000-07:00

Dear All:

Yesterday afternoon, I wrote a post about being happy. Little did I know or expect the tragedy to follow.

In the middle of my LSAT class, I received a call from a close friend, who informed me that another very close friend's father got shot multiple times by two gunmen in Los Angeles. I was shocked; I didn't know how to respond.

I never drove so fast. If pulled over, I had, I thought, a perfectly legitimate excuse to speed. Roads were taped and blocked. Instinctively, I swerved and parked my car. I ran passed the yellow tapes and police officers. Several officers stopped me....but only for a few seconds...I think my eyes told them everything they needed to know.

I won't forget the embrace between my friend (my brother) and I. His shudder, his tears and his agony. I cannot forget the boiling anger that bubbled inside my gut....I wanted to shout, punch and cry all at once. The only thought running through my mind was simply this: "Be strong, be strong, be strong..." The only words that came out of my mouth was this: "Be strong, be strong, be strong..."

It's 2:16 a.m.....it's hard to sleep. I want to pray for my friend and his family. I want to ask you all to keep them in your prayers.

UC Irvine School of Law

2007-05-22T15:17:00.000-07:00

Some of you probably already know, but I just got hold of wind that UCI got the "okay" to found its anticipated law school. The school is scheduled to open its doors in 2009.

Although Southern California has several notable law schools (i.e. UCLA, USC, Loyola, Southwestern, etc.), I'm eager to see how UCI's addition will affect pre-law students, employers and law schools. Typically, new law schools don't fair too well. But UCI is likely to be different. Unlike Loyola or Southwestern, UCI's law school has the benefit of being connected to the wider UC system. It will also benefit from its access to the university's other undergraduate and graduate programs. Arguably, prospective law students may prefer this diversity/diversion over stand-alone law schools, like Loyola and Southwestern.

UCLA Law is quite young, and yet within fifty-years it stands amongst the ranks of our nation's top law schools. I presume that the nice living condition and weather had a role in recruiting and retaining some of the top legal minds. UCI is in Orange County, which ain't as crowded and dirty as Los Angeles proper. Moreover, Orange County ain't that far from Downtown L.A. (Southern California's legal hub). In the footsteps of UCLA, I suspect UCI will have no problem recruiting and retaining top law professors, and thus soon after, top students.

Proud

2007-05-22T14:39:00.000-07:00

There are days when I'm extremely happy to be an LSAT instructor. Today is one of those days.

Three (the magic number) of my former students called me out of the blue. Below are excerpts from each conversation...

First conversation:
A: David, David! I got into UCLA!
Me: !#$%#$%$!$%!$!#!%!$%

Second conversation:
B: I decided to go to Yale.
Me: !$!%!!$%!$%!$%!$%!$%!%

Third conversation:
C: I'll be in Columbia this fall.
Me: !!$%!%!$!$%!$%!$%!$%!$%!

(FYI, !$!%!$%!$%!^$!$%!$%!$%!$%! = "Oh my goodness! I'm so happy for you! Congratulations! Let's do dinner!" No profanity at all.)

To be honest, there are times (like right now) when I feel that I'm not doing a good job as an instructor because students are becoming discouraged by their low scores and a few decide not to even show up to class.

But now, I feel that today is definitely a good day!

For those studying for the June LSAT, I want you to know that the above three students started out exactly where you are - stressed and discouraged yet hopeful.

To Make A Difference

2007-05-18T09:04:00.000-07:00

The power and privilege bestowed upon one possessing a law degree is obviously great. It's easy for law students, even pre-law students, who are so engrained in the learning process to forget what it meant to value the law degree from a layman's perspective. I feel that it's sort of like a diamond - afar from your possession it looks sparkly, shiny and desirable, but upfront, in your possession, you're so accustomed to it that it feels like just another rock.

This morning I am reminded by John Grisham of law graduates' illustrious potential to protect people.

EDIT: Deleted a part of this post.

More options for law students

2007-05-17T09:17:00.000-07:00

This morning I found myself grinning at my computer screen. "Uncle Sam Wants You (and Will Pay Off Your Loans)!"

According to this Wall Street Journal article, Congress has voted to pay off $60,000 for lawyers who work in the public defender's office or the prosecutor's office for 3+ years. I think this is a sexy deal!

Though it does not completely bridge the $$$ gap between private and public sector legal jobs, it does ease up (quite significantly) the burden that many law graduates feel when pursuing public sector jobs with loads of loans.

I wish, though unlikely, Congress will increase the amount ($60,000) at a rate consistent with law school tuition inflation.

Advice to a friend

2007-05-15T01:45:00.000-07:00

Today I had a great night out with my friends. Some of 'em were my former LSAT students.

One of 'em is struggling with an issue, to which I tried to give the best advice I can give. I thought I'd pose the issue to my fellow bloggers and see if I can get your input.

This former student (we'll call him J) is deciding between two schools: 4th tier school in S. California (his home) and a 3rd tier school in Michigan. He wants to eventually practice law in California (Orange County).

Given his two choices and preference, I advised him to attend the California school. There is no significant difference between a 3rd and 4th tier school. At the regional level, solid networking will take students further than school name/prestige. His only reason for wanting the Michigan school is its higher ranking in US News World Report, while his reasons for wanting the California school include proximity to the city, in which he will eventually practice law, and the already established networks with family and friends in the California legal industry.

What say you? Did I give him good advice?

Around the world in 730 days

2007-05-13T10:18:00.000-07:00

I attended a wedding yesterday. It was nice.

During the reception one of the guests took me by my hand to introduce me to her child. My faintest hope that perhaps this nice lady wanted me to meet her daughter wafted away as she introduced me to her son. "David goes to law school! Listen and learn as much as you can from him." The kid looked at me eagerly.

I felt extremely uneasy. For starters, I don't go to law school yet. And what to make of this awkward meeting. My romantic hope for maybe...just maybe meeting my soulmate at this wedding wasn't gonna happen.

"So what school do you go to?"
"I go to NYU."
"Wonderful school. What's your major?"
"Finance. But I was wondering if I should change it because I'm not sure if it'll help for law school."

At that instant my mind began to shoot in 80 different directions: "Why would you change your major for that?; Are you serious?; Why not do what you like?; Why so intent on law school?" It may have taken a while, but one-by-one I managed to organize my thoughts and get each of my questions out and answered.

There are several noteworthy thoughts that transpired during our conversation: 1) he would greatly benefit from seeing the world; 2) he needs a hobby; and 3) he needs to stop caring about the world's eyes.

1) When my friends and I returned from abroad, our first point of irritation was that many Americans (our family and friends) are very narrow minded and narcissistic - the world revolves around my country, my state, my city, my hometown, so why venture out? This kid had the entire, "I want to live and die in L.A.!" mentality - both geographically and figuratively. He was convinced that there was nothing better for him out there, so why bother to explore? While I admired his resolve, I was not altogether convinced that he knew what he was talking about. Judging from his mother's earlier actions, I knew that half, if not all, the things he wanted were, in actuality, his mother's desires.

Going abroad desensitizes these mothers - the physical distance forces 'em to understand that their children are not children.

2) Before applying to law school, I encourage working, traveling, playing, soul-searching, musing, or even reading. In fact, anything short of nothing will do. Most people, like this kid, go directly from Kindergarten to Elementary School, to Junior High, to High School, to College. And most people, when life's path is predetermined, go on auto-pilot - they never bother to feed their passion (btw, this is not unique to high-school/college aged kids). This kid needed a hobby. His "hobby" was studying.

3) Rather than studying what he loves or cares about, this kid does what he feels others love and care about. While I cannot completely discredit the value of playing the "game" (following the herd), there is a point of departure, where the groups desires and my desire differs greatly. To follow the masses in these areas is to kill your passion, and thus yourself. When this kid finally realizes that he's not happy, he may already be 40 years old, living with a woman other people want and love, working a job other people want and love, and associating with friends other people want and love, only to know that he wants and loves none of the above. (I admit I'm being a bit extreme =P)

Here's a challenge for everyone out there thinking about law school. Life is short, why don't you try to travel around the world in 730 days (2 years)? See what you can learn about yourself and the world around you. Pushing law school for 2 years won't kill you.

Timing the Beast!

2007-05-10T11:35:00.000-07:00

Lately, I've been getting a lot of questions regarding timing. Running against the clock can be quite stressful and my LSAT students are freaking out.

Whenever I get a, "I can't think straight when I think I'm running out of time," I give students the following analogy:

When you start learning how to swim, you learn, first and foremost, the proper forms and techniques (e.g. how to float, kick, stroke and breathe). You don't worry about how fast you can get from one side of the pool to the other side. LSAT is like swimming. Who cares if the national standard is to finish in 35-minutes; first learn the proper forms and techniques, then we'll worry about speed.

There's a Korean proverb that says, "If you try to catch two rabbits at once, you'll lose both." If you are still struggling with specific logical reasoning questions, games sections and reading comp passages, then don't try to improve both accuracy and speed at the same time cause you'll end up frustrating yourself more. Learn how to attack each question and fix your flaws before rushing.

Chicago forth~

2007-05-08T08:49:00.000-07:00

Some of you already know. I will be starting school this fall at the University of Chicago Law School! I'm extremely excited!

My "Journey to Law School" is almost complete. Once I begin school this fall, I will have to think about what to do with this blog (e.g. continue writing under another blog-title, start an entirely new blog, etc.).

Right now I'm packed up to the neck with LSAT teaching/tutoring, trying to make as much money before starting law school. Yet I'm torn. Making money is making money, I'll be doing that for the rest of my life. Not knowing what to do with months of leisure time, however, is something that comes once in a blue-moon. The only other time I felt this care-free, "I can do whatever I want," freedom was right after high-school graduation, but before starting college. That summer I spent all my money traveling around the world.

A part of me yearns to do something like that again. Yet another part of me is holding me down. It seems wiser to cut back on the amount of law school loans I take out by earning more money. Teaching LSAT full-time over the summer can earn me up to anywhere between $13,500-$22,500. That's a lot of money~

Snobbery

2007-05-05T16:46:00.000-07:00

Interesting blog that my friend forwarded to me. Lawyers are all about prestige (i.e., law school prestige, law firm prestige, etc.).

It's impossible not to think of prestige when deciding on which law school you go to. I won't deny that prestige is quite important when looking for a job (especially during down economies). But please remember, there's more to life than snobbery and prestige.

Everyone is deciding or has decided on which law school he/she will be attending. Congrats! For those waiting to get off waitlists, I'll keep my fingers crossed for you.

Visiting Law Schools: Chicago

2007-04-20T09:12:00.000-07:00

Chicago, Berkeley and Stanford each had their ASW on the same weekend. As for UPenn - the dean of admission called me to personally tell me not to come (long yet funny story). Since Berkeley and Stanford are only four-driving-hours away, I visited them the week preceding ASW. Here's a brief review on Stanford and Berkeley, then a thorough review on Chicago.

I was honestly more impressed with Berkeley students than with Stanford students. It may have been their "not a big deal" attitude about studying. I'm sure the "pass, honor & high-honor" grading system had a part. Although Stanford's architecture reminded me of a huge taco bell, the facilities and equipment at Stanford were much more posh than Berkeley's. Students at both schools boasted their amazing job prospects. One Stanford remarked, "The hardest part is choosing from the loads of options. Employers love us. Coming from Stanford you pretty much have the job, so you really have to purposely try for an employer to revoke an offer." Lastly, I was pleasantly surprised that Boalt wasn't "hippy" town.

Chicago was amazing. I should admit from the outset that I'm a bit infatuated with University of Chicago (yet another long and funny story for another time). To sum it up Chicago's ASW was a weekend of being wined and dined. I was particularly impressed with Dean Levmore, the faculty panel and the trivia contest.

I arrived to Chicago via Las Vegas (I won $11.00 from the airport slot machine...beginners luck!). At Las Vegas I met another admitted student. He and I sat together on our plane ride to Chicago. Once at Midway airport, my 2L host picked us up with his car. We stopped by his apartment (Regents Park) to drop off my luggage. Regents Park is in every sense of the word "a luxury apartment" - beep-in-security revolving door, elevator with elevator music, and a 24-hour security-doorman. My host's apartment was large with 2-bedroom and 2-baths. He had the Nintendo Wii, Playstation 2 and X-box 360....a video gamer's dream come true!

Afterwards we went directly to the law school. Chicago Law's architecture wasn't bad; in fact, I thought it was really nice (a lot of windows). Once inside at the Green lounge (the main lounge), I spotted admitted students, current students, professors, administrators and a dog (help dog that guides the disabled). I walked over to the table where Dean Perry and Mike Machen were registering and welcoming people. After finishing the formalities I spent the next hour chatting with current students. It felt nice and natural.

Next on the agenda was filing into charter buses to go to downtown Chicago. My ride there was pleasant due to the girl sitting next to me - her rather sarcastic and slap-in-the-face humor was just the thing to let time fly by. Shiff Hardin (the law firm) hosted us on the 66th floor of Sears Tower. The rolled-up shrimps, edamame, fried-dumplings, sushi, and open bar were definitely a nice touch. Throughout the reception partners walked up to me trying to sell their law firm - one even offered me a job (he may have been joking, but what the heck, it felt good).

Afterwards, it was off to Sluggers (the bar). This bar had a batting cage, so I spent the rest of the night hitting soft-balls. =)

The day after, Dean Levmore gave a rather amusing and superb welcome. He was very witty and to-the-point in answering everyone's question. He made it a point that Chicago is unique amongst other law schools because of its "life of the mind" and intimacy. Faculty panel followed next with Professors Baird, Buss, Samaha, and Henderson on the table. Professor Samaha and Henderson blew me away - they were absolutely brilliant. Professor Baird and Buss were also great, but Prof. Baird didn't speak much and Prof. Buss' topic of choice was far from my interest. The next big highlight for me was the "Faculty v. Student Trivia Contest" - it was hilarious! The students won with the faculty trailing very close behind (1 point).

Now my notorious list of positives and negatives:

Positive:
- Faculty is amazing (by far the best I've sampled thus far).
- A bus ride away from a great city
- Nice facilities
- Rigor: students are smart and serious
- Intimate and close-knit community
- Amazing job prospect and reputation
- Generally friendly student body

Negatives:
- Less than perfect weather (Windy City)
- Not the most safest neighborhood
- Rigor: students are smart and serious ("Where fun comes to die")

Big-Law Revolution

2007-04-03T09:20:00.000-07:00

Andrew Canter and Craig Segall, Stanford Law students, are heading up a new organization called, "Law Students Building a Better Legal Profession." The article can be found here.

Here's an excerpt from the article:

“We are writing as a group of over 100 law students to propose a change in the way we all experience our profession. We are working to ensuring that practicing law does not mean giving up a commitment to family, community, and dedicated service to clients.”

Four Principles -

1) Making concrete steps towards a transactional billing system;
2) Reducing maximum billable hour expectations for partnership;
3) Implementing balanced hours policies that work; and
4) Making work expectations clear.

By next fall recruiting season, they want to compile a list of AmLaw 100 firms that have committed to their request, and let law students know which firms are on board and which are not.

What sort of negotiating leverage does this organization have? For starters, they are willing to exchange all of the above for lesser money (salary). It is the organization's belief that they have enough market power to make the difference.

Here's my 2 cents from a law student's stand point.
Most law students don't have the insight or wisdom to see beyond money. When law firms wave $160,000, their primal instinct comes screaming back. They begin to see light and hope for paying off that $150,000 loan. This coupled with the "grass looks greener on the other side" tendency, law students all too often think: "It won't be that bad being a highly paid associate at a top-notch firm! In fact, it'll be awesome!"
It isn't until they are working associates that most law students realize they are cuffed in golden chains. As the organizers of this organization astutely point out, all negotiating power goes out the window, once law students are associates, so change must start from the law student level.
Thus, for this organization to get real results, they need to spend more fire power and time preaching to the law students. Fortunately, more and more associates are getting the message out that they are "extremely unhappy" by leaving their firms. The organization should go a step further and connect these dissatisfied attorneys with current law students, so that the law students can get it directly from the horse's mouth.

Now, from AmLaw 100 stand point, this new organization may seem a bit brazen: who do these kids think they are?
Law firms are generally conservative in their management and business. But just like their proteges, they are moved by money. The main question for these law firms will be, "Will it affect our profit?" If lowering associate salaries across the board (keep in mind, they are going to hit some rough pavement, if they try to lower the salaries of already practicing associates) in exchange for all of the above requests won't affect their profit, law firms should (in theory) jump at this proposal.

Personally, I think, as I mentioned in a previous post, some sort of free-market system (like ibanking) would be better. Start off with a lower base salary, but award increased bonuses to those who were most productive. Let those who want to work their butt-off do so. Let those who want more control of their time do so.
I don't see how or why the nature of modern legal profession wouldn't allow for such a system. Perhaps there is something I don't see. If anyone can provide invaluable bits to contribute to my meager knowledge, I'm greatly indebted to her/him.

Reading Comp is 50% psychology

2007-03-31T23:23:00.000-07:00

A large part of performing well on the reading comp section of the LSAT is changing your mindset. You have to think, "This is SO interesting!" And really believe that it is!

I know this is easier said than done. Usually when given homework assignments, students have no problem mowing through logical reasoning and game questions. It's the reading comp passages/questions that they get flaky on. When asked why they get flaky, most respond by saying, "It's mind numbingly boring."

For those struggling with this very problem, I have devised a method (albeit a quirky one).

When you learned how to walk, you probably first learned how to crawl. Likewise, to transform the reading comp section into an exhilirating experience, you have to first learn to realize that it ain't so bad.

Next time you go to the restroom (to do the deed), I suggest you take with you a reading comp passage. Humor me and hear me out. When you're on the toilet at school (or in any public place), your mind starts wandering. And as if you don't have anything better to do, you begin to scrutinize every scribble and doodle on the stall. Why do we do this?

When you're at an upscale restroom at some fancy restaurant, you don't have these wonderous distractions. So you move your eyes to the restroom floor, where you find many little squares and diamonds. And you sit there counting 'em and/or making bigger shapes.

When you're on the toilet, anything and everything is interesting because your mind is bored.

If the bathroom floor can be this interesting, imagine how interesting your LSAT reading comp passage would be on the toilet.

After doing this exercise several times, when you return to your desk, convincing yourself that the reading comp passage "ain't that bad" is only a matter of remembering your quirky adventures on the toilet.

Several hundreds of students have tried this method, and they've attested to its amazing effect. Try it. What have you got to lose? =)

Lack of diversity. LSAT is the culprit.

2007-03-30T11:09:00.000-07:00

Interesting article.

"In law schools throughout the country, the number of Black applicants, students and graduates are all declining."

I don't know if condemning the ABA is the most effective remedy, but I suppose it's the place anyone would start in his/her attempt to make a difference in legal education.

It's also no surprise that the LSAT took some heat.

As an LSAT instructor, I know and am convinced that the LSAT can be studied for. Many African-American students, however, don't have the finanical luxury to pay $1000 - $1300 for a LSAT course.
Since this "condemning" originated from Congress, perhaps Congress ought to consider making student loans available for students who want to take test prep courses.

But a journey...

2007-03-27T03:18:00.000-07:00

Law school is not the ending chapter of your story. It is not the answer to your life's search for a purpose. Law school will certainly not make you happy.

One thing I find extremely common amongst all my LSAT students (regardless of their score) is their "happy ever after" attitude about law school. While studying for the LSAT, one of my best students cried and mumbled to me: "I need to get into Harvard." She spent hours and hours each day studying for the LSAT. Despite my efforts to comfort her and help her relax, she stressed and cried right up until (and even after) the test. Law school was EVERYTHING to her. Getting into law school was the final act, and she was convinced that nothing mattered more than getting into Harvard. (She eventually did get into Harvard).

It honestly saddens me a bit to see this self-induced torture. Having an absolutist view of law school is already placing too much pressure on one's shoulder. And imagine the disappointment crashing down on someone who finds themselves just as lost and desperate as they were before law school.

This is exactly why I get excited when my LSAT students decide to take some time off before going to law school. Any job, I mean ANY job, will help bring perspective to one's legal education.

Law school is not the finish. It is but a journey; a means to an end.

Interesting concept

2007-03-19T22:35:00.000-07:00

A high school friend started the company called eMax.

The concept is very simple: you join and save money at your favorite stores because the group (members of eMax) will collectively make massive, high volume purchases at those stores.

Honestly, I'm not sure if this will work, I have my doubts. But if it does work, then I would love to save money at Jamba Juice and the movie theatres!

Live or Die in L.A.

2007-03-19T20:41:00.000-07:00

The June LSAT is slowly creeping nearer. And unfortunately for those in Los Angeles there aren't many places to take it - only Southwestern Law and University of Southern California (USC).

The number of students taking the June LSAT is typically smaller than those taking the October LSAT, but I'm still a bit surprised that Loyola and UCLA won't be available for testing.

Perhaps the new twist to the LSAT is discouraging people from being what they perceive as the first group of guinea pigs, and as a result, LSAC is responding by hosting the test at fewer test centers.